我国工业企业在新产品出口中的次序选择——以对美国市场出口为例
5448 
2628
财经研究 2014 年 第 40 卷第 12 期, 页码：128 - 140
摘要
参考文献
摘要
文章基于2000-2006年中国海关HS-8数据库和1999-2006年中国工业企业数据库的匹配数据,以企业新产品出口的市场进入次序为对象,研究我国工业企业对最大出口市场——美国出口新产品时的角色选择,结果表明:在119种新产品中,156家企业充当先驱者,791家企业充当跟随者;"三资"企业对引领我国企业进行新产品出口具有重要的作用,但其出口以加工贸易为主,并不利于我国贸易结构的调整。在此基础上,文章利用离散选择模型对我国企业市场进入的次序与其异质性特征进行了实证检验,发现低效率、大规模、低风险厌恶程度、位于开放城市以及加工贸易企业在新产品出口中更倾向于充当先驱者。
[1]梁会君,史长宽.国内外贸易成本差异、行业要素密集度与我国出口“生产率悖论”——基于中国制造业动态面板数据[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,(10):54-67.
[2]钱学锋,熊平.中国出口增长的二元边际及其因素决定[J].经济研究,2010,(1):65-79.
[3]钱学锋,王胜,陈勇兵.中国的多产品出口企业及其产品范围:事实与解释[J].管理世界,2013,(1):9-27.
[4]汤二子,李影,张海英.异质性企业、出口与“生产率悖论”——基于2007年中国制造业企业层面的证据[J].南开经济研究,2011,(3):79-96.
[5]Albornoz F,Calvo Pardo H F,Corcos G,et al.Sequential exporting[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,88(1):17-31.
[6]Alvarez R,Faruq H,López R A.Is previous exporting experience relevant for new exports?[R].Working Papers Central Bank of Chile,No.599,Central Bank of Chile,2010
[7]Antras P.Firms,contracts and trade structure[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003,118(4):1375-1418.
[8]Bernard A B,Jensen J B.Why some firms export[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2004,86(2):561-569.
[9]Bernard A B,Jensen J B,Redding S J,et al.The margins of US trade[J].American Economic Review,2009,99(2):487-493.
[10]Chaney T.Distorted gravity:The intensive and extensive margins of international trade[J].American Economic Review,2008,98(4):1707-1721.
[11]Eaton J,Eslava M,Kuglery M,et al.Export dynamics in Colombia:firm-level evidence[R].NBER Working Papers No.13531,2007.
[12]Hausmann R,Rodrik D.Economic development as self-discovery[J].Journal of Development Economics,2003,72(2):603-633.
[13]Iacovone L,Javorcik B.Multi-product exporters:Product churning,uncertainty and export discoveries[J].The Economic Journal,2010,120(544):481-499.
[14]Lieberman M B,Montgomery D B.First-mover advantages[J].Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(S1):41-58
[15]Lieberman M B,Montgomery D B.First-mover advantages:Retrospective and link with the resourcebased view[J].Strategic Management Journal,1998,12(19):1111-1125.
[16]Melitz M J.The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity[J].Econometrica,2003,71(6):1695-1725.
[17]Morales E,Sheu G,Zahler A.Gravity and extended gravity:Using moment inequalities to estimate a model of export entry[R].NBER No.19916,2014.
[18]NaudéW,Gries T,Bilkic N.Firm-level heterogeneity and the decision to export:A real option approach[R].IZA Discussion Papers,No.7346,2013.
[19]Nguyen D X.Demand Uncertainty:Exporting delays and exporting failures[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,86(2):336-344.
[20]Schmeiser K N.Learning to export:Export growth and the destination decision of Firms[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,87:89-97.
[21]Segura-Cayuela R,Vilarrubia J M.Uncertainty and entry into export markets[J].Banco de Espaa Working Paper No.0811,2008.
[22]Sheard M K,Ross S,Cheung A.Educational effectiveness of an intervention programme for social-emotional learning[J].Journal of Multiple Research Approaches,2012,6(3):264-284.
[23]Wagner R,Zahler A.New exporters from emerging markets:Do followers benefit from pioneers?[R].MPRA Paper No.30312,2011.
1 包括14个沿海开放城市和4个经济特区:大连、秦皇岛、天津、烟台、青岛、连云港、南通、上海、宁波、温州、福州、广州、湛江、北海、深圳、珠海、汕头和厦门。
2 鉴于本文篇幅有限,表3并没有列出为控制产品种类个体效应而形成的118个虚拟变量以及为控制行业效应而形成的29个虚拟变量的回归结果。如需要,可联系作者。
[2]钱学锋,熊平.中国出口增长的二元边际及其因素决定[J].经济研究,2010,(1):65-79.
[3]钱学锋,王胜,陈勇兵.中国的多产品出口企业及其产品范围:事实与解释[J].管理世界,2013,(1):9-27.
[4]汤二子,李影,张海英.异质性企业、出口与“生产率悖论”——基于2007年中国制造业企业层面的证据[J].南开经济研究,2011,(3):79-96.
[5]Albornoz F,Calvo Pardo H F,Corcos G,et al.Sequential exporting[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,88(1):17-31.
[6]Alvarez R,Faruq H,López R A.Is previous exporting experience relevant for new exports?[R].Working Papers Central Bank of Chile,No.599,Central Bank of Chile,2010
[7]Antras P.Firms,contracts and trade structure[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2003,118(4):1375-1418.
[8]Bernard A B,Jensen J B.Why some firms export[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,2004,86(2):561-569.
[9]Bernard A B,Jensen J B,Redding S J,et al.The margins of US trade[J].American Economic Review,2009,99(2):487-493.
[10]Chaney T.Distorted gravity:The intensive and extensive margins of international trade[J].American Economic Review,2008,98(4):1707-1721.
[11]Eaton J,Eslava M,Kuglery M,et al.Export dynamics in Colombia:firm-level evidence[R].NBER Working Papers No.13531,2007.
[12]Hausmann R,Rodrik D.Economic development as self-discovery[J].Journal of Development Economics,2003,72(2):603-633.
[13]Iacovone L,Javorcik B.Multi-product exporters:Product churning,uncertainty and export discoveries[J].The Economic Journal,2010,120(544):481-499.
[14]Lieberman M B,Montgomery D B.First-mover advantages[J].Strategic Management Journal,1988,9(S1):41-58
[15]Lieberman M B,Montgomery D B.First-mover advantages:Retrospective and link with the resourcebased view[J].Strategic Management Journal,1998,12(19):1111-1125.
[16]Melitz M J.The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity[J].Econometrica,2003,71(6):1695-1725.
[17]Morales E,Sheu G,Zahler A.Gravity and extended gravity:Using moment inequalities to estimate a model of export entry[R].NBER No.19916,2014.
[18]NaudéW,Gries T,Bilkic N.Firm-level heterogeneity and the decision to export:A real option approach[R].IZA Discussion Papers,No.7346,2013.
[19]Nguyen D X.Demand Uncertainty:Exporting delays and exporting failures[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,86(2):336-344.
[20]Schmeiser K N.Learning to export:Export growth and the destination decision of Firms[J].Journal of International Economics,2012,87:89-97.
[21]Segura-Cayuela R,Vilarrubia J M.Uncertainty and entry into export markets[J].Banco de Espaa Working Paper No.0811,2008.
[22]Sheard M K,Ross S,Cheung A.Educational effectiveness of an intervention programme for social-emotional learning[J].Journal of Multiple Research Approaches,2012,6(3):264-284.
[23]Wagner R,Zahler A.New exporters from emerging markets:Do followers benefit from pioneers?[R].MPRA Paper No.30312,2011.
1 包括14个沿海开放城市和4个经济特区:大连、秦皇岛、天津、烟台、青岛、连云港、南通、上海、宁波、温州、福州、广州、湛江、北海、深圳、珠海、汕头和厦门。
2 鉴于本文篇幅有限,表3并没有列出为控制产品种类个体效应而形成的118个虚拟变量以及为控制行业效应而形成的29个虚拟变量的回归结果。如需要,可联系作者。
引用本文
刘慧, 綦建红. 我国工业企业在新产品出口中的次序选择——以对美国市场出口为例[J]. 财经研究, 2014, 40(12): 128–140.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：财经研究2014年总目录
