4554 
4272数字化转型浪潮席卷全球，但中国企业数字化转型效果却不尽如人意，其中一个重要原因是领导力不足。目前，已有文献综述多从团队层面探讨领导如何推动数字化转型，缺乏多层面的视角，也缺乏对数字化转型和领导之间相互影响的介绍。调适性结构理论指出，技术的使用被其嵌入的情境所影响，同时它也能塑造情境。本文基于调适性结构理论搭建文献综述框架，探讨数字化转型和领导的关系：一方面，梳理数字化转型对领导职能、领导行为、领导能力的影响；另一方面，阐明领导在组织、团队、个体层面如何推动数字化转型。最后，基于现有研究的局限性，提出未来研究方向。
数字化转型和领导的相互影响——基于调适性结构理论的视角
摘要
参考文献
1 陈建勋, 凌媛媛, 刘松博. 领导者中庸思维与组织绩效: 作用机制与情境条件研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2010, 13(2): 132-141. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2010.02.015
2 陈威如, 王节祥. 依附式升级: 平台生态系统中参与者的数字化转型战略[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(10): 195-213. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.10.015
4 杜鹃. 领导者在预测性决策中运用大数据技术的基本方略[J]. 领导科学, 2020, (20): 122-124. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2020.20.036
6 段柯. 数字时代领导力的维度特征与提升路径[J]. 领导科学, 2020, (16): 60-62. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2020.16.017
7 高中华, 赵晨, 付悦, 等. 团队情境下忧患型领导对角色绩效的多层链式影响机制研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 186-201,216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.09.016
8 顾琴轩, 张冰钦. 虚拟团队变革型和交易型领导对团队创造力的影响机理: 共享领导视角[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2017, (11): 6-16,107. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4124.2017.11.002
9 郭润萍, 韩梦圆, 邵婷婷, 等. 生态视角下数字化转型企业的机会开发机理——基于海尔和苏宁的双案例研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(9): 43-67. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20210802.105
10 国务院发展研究中心课题组. 充分发挥“超大规模性”优势 推动我国经济实现从“超大”到“超强”的转变[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(1): 1-7,44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.01.003
11 郝旭光, 张嘉祺, 雷卓群, 等. 平台型领导: 多维度结构、测量与创新行为影响验证[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 186-199,216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.01.012
12 何玉杰, 余敬. 非工作时间电子沟通对员工时间侵占行为的影响: 基于资源保存理论视角[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2020, 37(1): 54-67. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4124.2020.01.005
16 李燕萍, 李乐, 胡翔. 数字化人力资源管理: 整合框架与研究展望[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(23): 151-160. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.2021070405
17 李燕萍, 苗力. 企业数字领导力的结构维度及其影响——基于中国情境的扎根理论研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 73(6): 125-136. DOI:10.14086/j.cnki.wujss.2020.06.013
19 梁阜, 邱圆心, 李琪. 双元环境下平台型领导如何促进组织持续创新能力提升——组织韧性的中介作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(15): 23-31.
26 谭红军, 郭传杰, 霍国庆, 等. 科技领导力要素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2007, 28(6): 115-122. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2995.2007.06.015
28 王侨, 周小虎, 李方圆. 情感事件理论视角下中层管理者角色超载对变革抵制的影响研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(4): 30-39.
30 王永伟, 李彬, 叶锦华, 等. CEO变革型领导行为、数字化能力与竞争优势: 环境不确定性的调节效应[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(5): 109-121. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2022.05.010
31 吴江, 陈婷, 龚艺巍, 等. 企业数字化转型理论框架和研究展望[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(12): 1871-1880. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2021.12.016
33 谢小云, 左玉涵, 胡琼晶. 数字化时代的人力资源管理: 基于人与技术交互的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 200-216. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.01.013
34 徐国玲. 基于阴阳共生的数字化赋能与协同策略研究[J]. 领导科学, 2019, (24): 97-99. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2019.24.029
37 于滨铜, 王志刚, 朱佳, 等. 援助结构、领导力与产业扶贫绩效[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (6): 23-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2021.06.002
38 贠杰. 组织领导力: 中国共产党治理成就的制度逻辑[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(8): 20-29. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.08.003
39 曾楚宏, 王斌, 朱仁宏. 团队领导研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2010, 32(12): 57-63. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2010.12.008
40 张光磊, 程欢, 李铭泽. 非工作时间电子沟通对员工主动性行为影响研究[J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(3): 154-165. DOI:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2019.03.014
42 张欣瑞, 范正芳, 陶晓波. 大数据在人力资源管理中的应用空间与挑战——基于谷歌与腾讯的对比分析[J]. 中国人力资源开发, 2015, (22): 52-57,73. DOI:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2015.22.009
43 张哲, 阳镇, 陈劲, 等. 国有企业数字化转型的多重模式比较——来自50个国有企业案例的分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(16): 1-10.
47 中国科学院“科技领导力研究”课题组. 领导力五力模型研究[J]. 领导科学, 2006, (9): 20-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2006.09.009
49 周莹, 王二平. 团队领导的职能、决定因素及有效性[J]. 心理科学进展, 2005, 13(6): 780-787. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2005.06.013
50 朱健, 张彬. 因循守旧, 还是独辟蹊径?数字化领导对团队与个体创造力的多层次影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, DOI: 10.6049/kjjbydc.2022060662.
52 Aleem M, Sufyan M, Ameer I, et al. Remote work and the COVID-19 pandemic: An artificial intelligence-based topic modeling and a future agenda[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2023, 154: 113303. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113303
53 AlNuaimi B K, Singh S K, Ren S, et al. Mastering digital transformation: The nexus between leadership, agility, and digital strategy[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 145: 636-648. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.038
54 Antonacopoulou E P, Georgiadou A. Leading through social distancing: The future of work, corporations and leadership from home[J]. Gender, Work & Organization, 2021, 28(2): 749-767.
55 Avolio B J, Kahai S, Dodge G E. E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2000, 11(4): 615-668. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00062-X
56 Avolio B J, Sosik J J, Kahai S S, et al. E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2014, 25(1): 105-131. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003
57 Azhar M Q, Sklar E I. A study measuring the impact of shared decision making in a human-robot team[J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2017, 36(5-7): 461-482. DOI:10.1177/0278364917710540
58 Bakker A B, Demerouti E, Euwema M C. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2005, 10(2): 170-180. DOI:10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170
59 Bartsch S, Weber E, Büttgen M, et al. Leadership matters in crisis-induced digital transformation: How to lead service employees effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2020, 32(1): 71-85. DOI:10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0160
60 Battilana J, Gilmartin M, Sengul M, et al. Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2010, 21(3): 422-438. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.007
61 Bell B S, McAlpine K L, Hill N S. Leading virtually[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2023, 10: 339-362. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-050115
62 Benitez J, Arenas A, Castillo A, et al. Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability[J]. Information & Management, 2022, 59(2): 103590.
63 Bharadwaj A, El Sawy O A, Pavlou P A, et al. Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2013, 37(2): 471-482. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3
64 Brown S G, Hill N S, Lorinkova N N M. Leadership and virtual team performance: A meta-analytic investigation[J]. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2021, 30(5): 672-685. DOI:10.1080/1359432X.2021.1914719
65 Burke C S, Stagl K C, Klein C, et al. What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2006, 17(3): 288-307. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.007
66 Cascio W F, Montealegre R. How technology is changing work and organizations[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2016, 3: 349-375. DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
67 Charlier S D, Stewart G L, Greco L M, et al. Emergent leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel investigation of individual communication and team dispersion antecedents[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2016, 27(5): 745-764. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.002
68 Chatterjee S, Chaudhuri R, Vrontis D, et al. Digital transformation of organization using AI-CRM: From microfoundational perspective with leadership support[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 153: 46-58. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.019
69 Christofi M, Khan H, Zahoor N, et al. Digital transformation of SMEs: The role of entrepreneurial persistence and market sensing dynamic capability[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2023, DOI: 10.1109/tem.2022.3230248.
70 Contreras F, Baykal E, Abid G. E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: What we know and where do we go[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2020, 11: 590271. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590271
71 Cortellazzo L, Bruni E, Zampieri R. The role of leadership in a digitalized world: A review[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10: 1938. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938
72 DeSanctis G, Poole M S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(2): 121-147. DOI:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
73 Dettmers J, Vahle-Hinz T, Bamberg E, et al. Extended work availability and its relation with start-of-day mood and cortisol[J]. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2016, 21(1): 105-118. DOI:10.1037/a0039602
74 Drescher M A, Korsgaard M A, Welpe I M, et al. The dynamics of shared leadership: Building trust and enhancing performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014, 99(5): 771-783. DOI:10.1037/a0036474
75 Erhan T, Uzunbacak H H, Aydin E. From conventional to digital leadership: Exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior[J]. Management Research Review, 2022, 45(11): 1524-1543. DOI:10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
76 Fleishman E A, Mumford M D, Zaccaro S J, et al. Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 1991, 2(4): 245-287. DOI:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-U
77 Gajendran R S, Harrison D A. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 92(6): 1524-1541. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
78 Grafström M, Falkman L L. Everyday narratives: CEO rhetoric on Twitter[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2017, 30(3): 312-322. DOI:10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0197
79 Hassard J, Morris J. The extensification of managerial work in the digital age: Middle managers, spatio-temporal boundaries and control[J]. Human Relations, 2022, 75(9): 1647-1678. DOI:10.1177/00187267211003123
80 Henderikx M, Stoffers J. An exploratory literature study into digital transformation and leadership: Toward future-proof middle managers[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(2): 687. DOI:10.3390/su14020687
81 Hill N S, Bartol K M. Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2016, 69(1): 159-198. DOI:10.1111/peps.12108
82 Hoch J E, Dulebohn J H. Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2017, 27(4): 678-693. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.012
83 Hoch J E, Kozlowski S W J. Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2014, 99(3): 390-403. DOI:10.1037/a0030264
84 Hollenbeck J R, Beersma B, Schouten M E. Beyond team types and taxonomies: A dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2012, 37(1): 82-106.
85 Homan A C, Gündemir S, Buengeler C, et al. Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2020, 105(10): 1101-1128. DOI:10.1037/apl0000482
86 Hradecky D, Kennell J, Cai W J, et al. Organizational readiness to adopt artificial intelligence in the exhibition sector in Western Europe[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2022, 65: 102497. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102497
87 Huang R, Kahai S, Jestice R. The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2010, 26(5): 1098-1110. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.014
88 Johns G. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(2): 386-408. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
89 Joshi A, Lazarova M B, Liao H. Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams[J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(1): 240-252. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1080.0383
90 Kanawattanachai P, Yoo Y. The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2007, 31(4): 783-808. DOI:10.2307/25148820
91 Klebe L, Felfe J, Klug K. Healthy leadership in turbulent times: The effectiveness of health-oriented leadership in crisis[J]. British Journal of Management, 2021, 32(4): 1203-1218. DOI:10.1111/1467-8551.12498
92 Kozlowski S W J, Ilgen D R. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams[J]. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2006, 7(3): 77-124. DOI:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
93 Larson L, DeChurch L A. Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2020, 31(1): 101377. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
94 Liao C W. Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2017, 27(4): 648-659. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010
95 Lin C P, Chiu C K, Liu N T. Developing virtual team performance: An integrated perspective of social exchange and social cognitive theories[J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2019, 13(4): 671-688. DOI:10.1007/s11846-017-0261-0
96 Liu C, Ready D, Roman A, et al. E-leadership: An empirical study of organizational leaders’ virtual communication adoption[J]. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2018, 39(7): 826-843.
97 Lopez-Cabrales A, Bornay-Barrachina M, Diaz-Fernandez M. Leadership and dynamic capabilities: The role of HR systems[J]. Personnel Review, 2017, 46(2): 255-276. DOI:10.1108/PR-05-2015-0146
98 Mazmanian M, Orlikowski W J, Yates J. The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals[J]. Organization Science, 2013, 24(5): 1337-1357. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806
99 Meyer A D. Adapting to environmental jolts[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982, 27(4): 515-537. DOI:10.2307/2392528
100 Morgeson F P, Derue D S, Karam E P. Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes[J]. Journal of Management, 2010, 36(1): 5-39. DOI:10.1177/0149206309347376
101 Muethel M, Gehrlein S, Hoegl M. Socio-demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed teams: Implications for human resource management[J]. Human Resource Management, 2012, 51(4): 525-548. DOI:10.1002/hrm.21488
102 Nordbäck E S, Espinosa J A. Effective coordination of shared leadership in global virtual teams[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2019, 36(1): 321-350. DOI:10.1080/07421222.2018.1558943
103 Oc B. Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2018, 29(1): 218-235. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
104 Philippart M H. Success factors to deliver organizational digital transformation: A framework for transformation leadership[J]. Journal of Global Information Management, 2022, 30(8): 1-17.
105 Porfírio J A, Carrilho T, Felício J A, et al. Leadership characteristics and digital transformation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 124: 610-619. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.058
106 Purvanova R K, Bono J E. Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2009, 20(3): 343-357. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.004
107 Roman A V, Van Wart M, Wang X H, et al. Defining e-leadership as competence in ICT-mediated communications: An exploratory assessment[J]. Public Administration Review, 2019, 79(6): 853-866. DOI:10.1111/puar.12980
108 Romanelli E, Tushman M L. Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37(5): 1141-1166. DOI:10.2307/256669
109 Saarikko T, Westergren U H, Blomquist T. Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm[J]. Business Horizons, 2020, 63(6): 825-839. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.005
110 Schaubroeck J M, Yu A. When does virtuality help or hinder teams? Core team characteristics as contingency factors[J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2017, 27(4): 635-647. DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.009
111 Seeber I, Bittner E, Briggs R O, et al. Machines as teammates: A research agenda on AI in team collaboration[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(2): 103174.
112 Sergeeva A V, Faraj S, Huysman M. Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery[J]. Organization Science, 2020, 31(5): 1248-1271. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2019.1343
113 Shockley K M, Allen T D, Dodd H, et al. Remote worker communication during COVID-19: The role of quantity, quality, and supervisor expectation-setting[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2021, 106(10): 1466-1482. DOI:10.1037/apl0000970
115 Singh A, Hess T. How chief digital officers promote the digital transformation of their companies[J]. MIS Quarterly Executive, 2017, 16(1): 5.
116 Smith A M, Green M. Artificial intelligence and the role of leadership[J]. Journal of Leadership Studies, 2018, 12(3): 85-87.
117 Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 239-253. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12
118 Thatcher J B, Loughry M L, Lim J, et al. Internet anxiety: An empirical study of the effects of personality, beliefs, and social support[J]. Information & Management, 2007, 44(4): 353-363.
119 Tsai C Y, Marshall J D, Choudhury A, et al. Human-robot collaboration: A multilevel and integrated leadership framework[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2022, 33(1): 101594. DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101594
120 Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2): 118-144. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
121 Wang B, Liu Y K, Parker S K. How does the use of information communication technology affect individuals? A work design perspective[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2020, 14(2): 695-725. DOI:10.5465/annals.2018.0127
122 Wang T D, Lin X Y, Sheng F. Digital leadership and exploratory innovation: From the dual perspectives of strategic orientation and organizational culture[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 902693. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.902693
123 Warner K S R, Wäger M. Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019, 52(3): 326-349. DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001
124 Weber E, Büttgen M, Bartsch S. How to take employees on the digital transformation journey: An experimental study on complementary leadership behaviors in managing organizational change[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 143: 225-238. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.036
125 Yu H Y, Shum C, Alcorn M, et al. Robots can’t take my job: Antecedents and outcomes of Gen Z employees’ service robot risk awareness[J]. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2022, 34(8): 2971-2988. DOI:10.1108/IJCHM-10-2021-1312
126 Zaccaro S J, Rittman A L, Marks M A. Team leadership[J]. The Leadership Quarterly, 2001, 12(4): 451-483. DOI:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5
127 Zada M, Zada S, Ali M, et al. How classy servant leader at workplace? Linking servant leadership and task performance during the COVID-19 crisis: A moderation and mediation approach[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022, 13: 810227. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810227
128 Zeike S, Choi K E, Lindert L, et al. Managers’ well-being in the digital era: Is it associated with perceived choice overload and pressure from digitalization? An exploratory study[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(10): 1746. DOI:10.3390/ijerph16101746
129 Zhang Y X, Zhao R N, Yu X. Enhancing virtual team performance via high-quality interpersonal relationships: Effects of authentic leadership[J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2021, 43(4): 982-1000.
130 Zhou Y, Liu G J, Chang X X, et al. The impact of HRM digitalization on firm performance: Investigating three-way interactions[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 2021, 59(1): 20-43. DOI:10.1111/1744-7941.12258
引用本文
刘松博, 李静雯, 张凯瑞, 等. 数字化转型和领导的相互影响——基于调适性结构理论的视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(10): 116-136.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：人工智能营销：研究述评与展望
