本文从本土管理研究的视角出发,立足中国传统哲学的悟性思维,研究团队悟性创新过程。所谓悟性思维,是指怀抱放下束缚的心态,采取非二元对立的观察方法,运用取象比类的认知模式(由直觉、想象、象征、联想、类比等要素所构成),获得求解问题之本质洞见的思维过程。基于知识创新和组织学习文献,并借助西方哲学家哈贝马斯的非主题知识(来自生活世界)和主题知识(来自科学微世界)概念分类,以中国航天某一创新团队的四个悟性创新案例为研究对象,本文构建了团队悟性创新理论框架。研究发现,团队悟性创新涉及个体悟性和团队悟性两个层面,分为悟性开启、悟性运思和悟性实现三个阶段,团队悟性创新不仅要充分运用主题知识,更需要巧妙地借助于非主题知识的触类旁通式启发创造性地解决问题;团队成员通过运用取象比类的认知模式,在生活世界和科学微世界之间实现有效的跨域映射,进而获得新洞见和新方案。本研究的主要贡献在于构建团队悟性创新过程模型,包含:(1)知止——主题知识领域求解卡壳,(2)归零——放下束缚回归问题原点,(3)内观——运用不同于科学观察的方法获得原创却模糊的总体思路,(4)启发——在非主题知识领域通过联想与类比触发跨域的相通启发,(5)洞见——获得求解问题的清晰本质洞见,(6)落地——通过严谨论证构建创新方案等6步骤动态过程。此外,所选取的科研团队创新情境,提供了悟性与理性思维互补接轨的实例,为东西方思维方式的会通融合提供了生动的启示。
团队悟性创新理论框架:中国航天工程情境下的本土创新案例研究
摘要
参考文献
1 爱新觉罗•毓鋆. 毓老师说易传[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2016.
2 稻盛和夫著, 曹岫云译. 活法[M]. 北京: 东方出版社, 2012.
5 高晨阳. 中国传统思维方式研究[M]. 济南: 山东大学出版社, 1994.
6 高小斯. 禅话——西方哲学的禅化[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2008.
7 哈磊. 四念处研究[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2006.
9 黄光国. 社会科学的理路[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2006.
10 黄光国. 由「構念化」到「理論化」: 評「中庸實踐思維的心理學研究」[J]. 本土心理學研究, 2010,(34): 111–125.
13 卡普拉著, 朱润生译. 物理学之“道”: 近代物理学与东方神秘主义[M]. 北京: 北京出版社, 1999.
15 铃木大拙著, 刘大悲译. 禅与生活[M]. 北京: 光明日报出版社, 1988.
16 铃木大拙著, 孟祥森译. 悟性的提升[M]. 上海: 上海三联书店, 2013.
17 铃木俊隆著,梁永安译. 禅者的初心[M]. 海口: 海南出版社, 2010.
19 李平, 曹仰锋. 案例研究方法: 理论与范例——凯瑟琳•艾森哈特论文集[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012.
20 李平, 曹仰锋. 悟性: 企业家认知的至高境界[J]. 中欧商业评论, 2014,(4): 36–43.
24 李约瑟著, 何兆武译. 中国科学技术史(第二卷): 科学思想史[M]. 北京: 科学出版社; 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1990.
25 刘长林. 中国系统思维[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1990.
26 刘君祖. 详解《易经•系辞传》[M]. 北京: 新星出版社, 2011.
29 牟宗三. 中国哲学十九讲[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 1997.
30 钱学森. 中国大学为何创新力不足[N]. 文汇报, 2009-11-17.
34 王树人, 喻柏林. 传统智慧再发现(上卷)——常青的智慧与艺魂[M]. 北京: 作家出版社, 1996.
35 王树人, 李明珠. 感悟庄子: “象思维”视野下的《庄子》[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2006.
36 王树人. 回归原创之思——“象思维”视野下的中国智慧[M]. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 2012.
37 王树人. 中西文化比较与会通研究[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2014.
38 王馨. 面向创新的代际知识转移方法与机制——基于中国航天导师制的案例研究[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013.
41 沃尔特•艾萨克森著, 管延圻, 魏群, 余倩, 等译. 史蒂夫•乔布斯传[M]. 北京: 中信出版社, 2011.
43 杨义. 感悟通论[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2008.
44 于尔根•哈贝马斯著, 曹卫东, 付德根译. 后形而上学思想[M]. 南京: 译林出版社, 2001.
45 张岱年, 成中英. 中国思维偏向[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1991.
46 Bledow R, Rosing K, Frese M. A dynamic perspective on affect and creativity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(2): 432–450. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0894
47 Crossan M M, Lane H W, White R E. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(3): 522–537.
48 Eisenhardt K M. Building theories from case study research[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(4): 532–550.
49 Eisenhardt K M, Graebner M E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 25–32. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
50 Eling K, Griffin A, Langerak F. Using intuition in fuzzy front-end decision-making: A conceptual framework[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014, 31(5): 956–972. DOI:10.1111/jpim.12136
51 Epstein R, Kirshnit C E, Lanza R P, et al. “Insight” in the pigeon: Antecedents and determinants of an intelligent performance[J]. Nature, 1984, 308(5954): 61–62. DOI:10.1038/308061a0
52 Evans J S B T. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2008, 59: 255–278. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
53 Grant A M. Rethinking the extraverted sales ideal: The ambivert advantage[J]. Psychological Science, 2013, 24(6): 1024–1030. DOI:10.1177/0956797612463706
54 Hargadon A B, Bechky B A. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work[J]. Organization Science, 2006, 17(4): 484–500. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
55 Hooke C, Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. The group as mentor: Social capital and the systems model of creativity[A]. Paulus P B, Nijstad A. Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration[C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
56 Kaufman S B,Gregoire C. Wired to create: Unraveling the mysteries of the creative mind[M]. New York: Perigee Book, 2015.
57 Kounios J, Beeman M. The cognitive neuroscience of insight[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2014, 65: 71–93. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154
58 Lafont C, Medina J.The linguistic turn in hermeneutic philosophy[M]. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press, 1999.
59 Lakoff G. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas?[J]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1990, 1(1): 39–74. DOI:10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
60 Li P P. Exploring the unique roles of trust and play in private creativity: From the complexity-ambiguity-metaphor link to the trust-play-creativity link[J]. Journal of Trust Research, 2012a, 2(1): 71–97. DOI:10.1080/21515581.2012.659937
61 Li P P. Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the East: How to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management[J]. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 2016, 23(1): 42–77.
62 Li P P. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang balance[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2012b, 29(4): 849–872. DOI:10.1007/s10490-011-9250-z
63 Li P P. Toward the geocentric framework of intuition: The Yin-Yang balancing between the Eastern and Western perspectives on intuition[A]. Sinclair M. Handbook of research methods on intuition[C].Northampton, Ma: Edward Elgar Publishers, 2014: 28–41.
64 March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71–87. DOI:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
65 Martin R L. The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2009.
66 Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1): 14–37. DOI:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
67 Nonaka I, von Krogh G, Voelpel S. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances[J]. Organization Studies, 2006, 27(8): 1179–1208. DOI:10.1177/0170840606066312
68 Ohlsson S. Restructuring revisited: I. Summary and critique of the gestalt theory of problem solving[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1984, 25(1): 65–78. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1984.tb01001.x
69 Paulus P B, NijstadBA. Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
70 Polanyi M. Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy[M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
71 Polanyi M, Prosch H. Meaning[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1975.
72 Rathbone J P. Zen and the art of management[N]. Financial Times, 2013-09-16.
73 Schumpeter J. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy[M]. New York: Harper, 1942.
74 Siggelkow N. Persuasion with case studies[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(1): 20–24. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160882
75 Simonton D K. Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test[J]. Developmental Review, 2000, 20(2): 283–318. DOI:10.1006/drev.1999.0504
76 Tsui A S. Contextualization in Chinese management research[J]. Management and Organization Review, 2006, 2(1): 1–13. DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00033.x
77 Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes[M]. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
78 Wallas G.The art of thought[M]. London: Harcourt-Brace, 1926.
79 Wang X, Gong J G. Evolutionary path of indigenous management researchers toward geocentric integration from a knowledge perspective[A]. Li P P.The International forum on Chinese management research Ⅱ[C]. Lanzhou, 2010: 38–42.
80 Weisberg R W. Prolegomena to theories of insight in problem solving: A taxonomy of problems[A]. Sternberg R J, Davidson J E. The nature of insight[C].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
81 Wertheimer M. Productive thinking[M]. New York: Harper, 1945.
82 Williams E A. Team mentoring: New directions for employee development in organizations[A]. Presented at the academy of management meeting[C].Toronto, Canada, 2000.
83 Zhou J. Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83(2): 261–276. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261
84 Zhou J, Shalley C E. Handbook of organizational creativity[M]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007.
引用本文
王馨, 李平. 团队悟性创新理论框架:中国航天工程情境下的本土创新案例研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(3): 3–21.
导出参考文献,格式为:
下一篇:媒体报道与资产定价:研究综述