企业理论丛林中的新韦伯主义
5735 
0
外国经济与管理 2005 年 第 27 卷第 05 期, 页码：10 - 15
摘要
参考文献
摘要
在企业“为何”存在和企业“如何”运行这两个问题上,现代企业理论提出了各种各样的假说,导致了当前的理论丛林状态。马克斯·韦伯的官僚科层思想为同时解释这两个问题提供了理论基础。新韦伯主义以决策规则为唯一的核心概念,赋予其唯一的定义,并在各派观点上提出了统一的假设,最终建立了基于决策规则的企业理论,是韦伯的科层效率思想在企业理论研究领域的进一步扩展。新韦伯主义企业理论只是结束现代企业理论丛林状态的一种尝试,有助于解释创新型企业的问题,但并不能包容企业理论所有的重要方面,特别是企业规模问题。
[1]Foss,N J Knowledge based approaches to the theory of the firm: some critical comments[J]OrganizationScience,1996,7(5):470-476
[2]Williamson,O Hierarchies, markets and power in the economy: an economic perspective[J]Industrial andCorporateChange,1995,4(1):21-49
[3]Palermo,GiulioEconomic power and the firm in new institutional economics: two conflicting problems[J]Journal ofEconomicIssues,2000,19(3):573-601
[4]Machlup,F Theories of the firm: marginalist, behavioral, managerialist[J]AmericanEconomicReview,1967,52(1):1-33
[5]Kalberg,S MaxWeber’s types of rationality: cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history[J]A mericanJournal ofSociology,1980,85(5):1145-1179
[6]Coase,R H The nature of the firm[J]Economica,1937,4(4):386-405
[7]Williamson,O Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives[J]AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,1991,36(2):269-296
[8]Weber,M Economy and society: an outline of interpretative sociology[M]Berkeley:University ofCaliforniaPress,1978:973,975,980-988
[9]朱国云组织理论:历史与流派[M]南京:南京大学出版社,1997:43-50
[10]Heugens,PurseyA neoWeberian theory of the firm[R]TjallingC KoopmansResearchInstitute,DiscussionPaperSeries,2004:13,15-19
[11]Heugens,Pursey,C B vanRiel, andF van denBoschReputation management capabilities as decision rules[J]JournalofManagementStudies,2004,41(8):1349-1377
[12]Roberts,P W, andR GreenwoodIntegrating transaction cost and institutional theories: toward a constrained efficiencyframework for understanding organizational design adoption[J]Academy ofManagementReview,1997,22(2):346-373
[13]Thompson,J D Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory[M]NewYork:McGrawHill,1967:54
[14]Knight,F Risk, uncertainty, and profit[M]London:Series ofReprints ofScarceTracts inEconomics andPoliticalScience,1933:Preface to theReissue
[15]Boudreaux,DonaldJ, andRandallG HolcombeTheCoasian andKnightian theories of the firm[J]Managerial andDecisionEconomics,1989,10(2):147-154
[16]Foss,N J.More on knight and the theory of the firm[J]Managerial andDecisionEconomics,1993,14(3):269-276
[17]Williamson,O E (1985);段毅才,王伟(译)资本主义制度[M]北京:商务印书馆,2002:186
[18]Milgrom,P, andJohnRobertsBargaining costs, influence costs, and the organization of economic activity[A]InJamesE Alt andKennethA Shepsle, edsPerspectives on political economy[C]Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1990:57-89
[19]Mises,Ludwig vonPlannedChaos[M]Irvington onHudson,N Y:Foundation forEconomicEducationReprintedas“Epilogue”toMisesSocialism: an economic and sociological analysis[M]Indianapolis:LibertyClassics,1981:493
[2]Williamson,O Hierarchies, markets and power in the economy: an economic perspective[J]Industrial andCorporateChange,1995,4(1):21-49
[3]Palermo,GiulioEconomic power and the firm in new institutional economics: two conflicting problems[J]Journal ofEconomicIssues,2000,19(3):573-601
[4]Machlup,F Theories of the firm: marginalist, behavioral, managerialist[J]AmericanEconomicReview,1967,52(1):1-33
[5]Kalberg,S MaxWeber’s types of rationality: cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history[J]A mericanJournal ofSociology,1980,85(5):1145-1179
[6]Coase,R H The nature of the firm[J]Economica,1937,4(4):386-405
[7]Williamson,O Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives[J]AdministrativeScienceQuarterly,1991,36(2):269-296
[8]Weber,M Economy and society: an outline of interpretative sociology[M]Berkeley:University ofCaliforniaPress,1978:973,975,980-988
[9]朱国云组织理论:历史与流派[M]南京:南京大学出版社,1997:43-50
[10]Heugens,PurseyA neoWeberian theory of the firm[R]TjallingC KoopmansResearchInstitute,DiscussionPaperSeries,2004:13,15-19
[11]Heugens,Pursey,C B vanRiel, andF van denBoschReputation management capabilities as decision rules[J]JournalofManagementStudies,2004,41(8):1349-1377
[12]Roberts,P W, andR GreenwoodIntegrating transaction cost and institutional theories: toward a constrained efficiencyframework for understanding organizational design adoption[J]Academy ofManagementReview,1997,22(2):346-373
[13]Thompson,J D Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory[M]NewYork:McGrawHill,1967:54
[14]Knight,F Risk, uncertainty, and profit[M]London:Series ofReprints ofScarceTracts inEconomics andPoliticalScience,1933:Preface to theReissue
[15]Boudreaux,DonaldJ, andRandallG HolcombeTheCoasian andKnightian theories of the firm[J]Managerial andDecisionEconomics,1989,10(2):147-154
[16]Foss,N J.More on knight and the theory of the firm[J]Managerial andDecisionEconomics,1993,14(3):269-276
[17]Williamson,O E (1985);段毅才,王伟(译)资本主义制度[M]北京:商务印书馆,2002:186
[18]Milgrom,P, andJohnRobertsBargaining costs, influence costs, and the organization of economic activity[A]InJamesE Alt andKennethA Shepsle, edsPerspectives on political economy[C]Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1990:57-89
[19]Mises,Ludwig vonPlannedChaos[M]Irvington onHudson,N Y:Foundation forEconomicEducationReprintedas“Epilogue”toMisesSocialism: an economic and sociological analysis[M]Indianapolis:LibertyClassics,1981:493
引用本文
李陈华. 企业理论丛林中的新韦伯主义[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2005, 27(5): 10–15.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：理性、情绪与个体经济决策
下一篇：国外新区域主义研究综述
