6986 
5105我国保险监管朝着"放开前端、管住后端"的模式发展,保险费率市场化改革的呼声始终较高。文章以财险市场中市场份额最大的车险为研究对象,基于2001-2014年样本分析了费率市场化与费率水平合理性之间的关系。研究发现,我国车险市场的实际费率水平明显低于理论费率;费率监管的严格程度的确会影响费率水平的合理性,其中适度监管模式下的费率水平最为合理。文章进一步深入探究了费率水平合理性对偿付能力的影响机制,发现费率差异的波动性会通过净利润而间接影响偿付能力。费率差异的波动性越小,净利润越高,偿付能力越强,因此应慎重选择费率监管制度。文章建议我国保险市场应采用适度监管的费率制度,完全放开的费率市场化略显激进,不适合当前国情。这样不仅能使费率水平更加合理,还不会威胁保险公司的偿付能力,从而使保险市场更加健康稳步的发展。
中国国情下的保险费率监管模式选择及影响分析——来自车险市场的经验证据
摘要
参考文献
1 崔 慧贤. 车险市场价格竞争的博弈分析:基于费率市场化改革背景. 保险研究, 2012 (6): 39–48
2 董 志勇. 费率市场化对车险市场影响的经济学模型分析. 保险研究, 2011 (5): 47–54
3 费 洁. 我国车险定价的适当性研究. 金融理论与实践, 2007 (4): 68–69
4 李 建昆. 我国车险市场结构的经济学分析. 中国经贸, 2009 (18): 77–78
5 刘 东. 新一轮车险价格战爆发风险不可忽视. 中国保险, 2014 (9): 38–42
6 孟 生旺. 交强险的经营结果和费率结构分析. 统计研究, 2008 (4): 66–71
7 魏 华林, 蔡 秋杰. 保险费率监管研究——兼论中国保险费率监管的悖论. 金融研究, 2005 (8): 171–181
8 于 丽娜. 我国车险市场承保周期研究——基于费率管制与市场准入限制的影响. 保险研究, 2013 (3): 73–80
9 周 县华. 我国交通事故责任强制保险定价研究——来自北京、吉林、内蒙古和山东的经验证据. 统计研究, 2010 (5): 81–86
10 Ballotta L, Haberman S, Wang N. Guarantees in with-profit and unitized with-profit life insurance contracts:Fair valuation problem in presence of the default option. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2006, 73(1): 97–121
11 Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173–1182
12 Berry-Stölzle T R, Born P. The effect of regulation on insurance pricing:The case of Germany. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2012, 79(1): 129–164
13 Blundell R, Bond S. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 1998, 87(1): 115–143
14 Cummins J D, Phillips R D, Tennyson S. Regulation, political influence and the price of automobile insurance. Journal of Insurance Regulation, 2001, 20(1): 9–50
15 Cummins J D, Xie X. Efficiency, productivity and scale economies in the US property-liability insurance industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2013, 39(2): 141–164
16 Derrig R A, Tennyson S. The impact of rate regulation on claims:Evidence from Massachusetts automobile insurance. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2011, 14(2): 173–199
17 Doherty N A, Garven J R. Insurance cycles:Interest rates and the capacity constraint model. Journal of Business, 1995, 68(3): 383–404
18 Doherty N A, Kang H B. Interest rates and insurance price cycles. Journal of Banking and Finance, 1988, 12(2): 199–214
19 Harrington S E, Niehaus G. Volatility and underwriting cycles;Dionne G. Handbook of insurance. Netherlands:Springer, 2000
20 Harrington S E. Effects of prior approval rate regulation of auto insurance;Deregulating property-liability insurance:Restoring competition and increasing market effiency. Washington,D C:AEI-Brooking Joint Centre for Regulatory Studies, 2002
21 Katrishen F A, Scordis N A. Economies of scale in services:A study of multinational insurers. Journal of International Business Studies, 1998, 29(2): 305–323
22 Leadbetter D, Voll J, Wieder E. The effects of rate regulation on the volatility of Auto insurance prices:Evidence from Canada. Assurances et Gestion des Risques, 2008, 76(1): 21–54
23 Tennyson S. The impact of rate regulation on state automobile insurance markets. Journal of Insu-rance Regulation, 1997, 15(4): 502–523
24 Winter R A. Solvency regulation and the property-liability "Insurance Cycle". Economic Inquiry, 1991, 29(3): 458–471
引用本文
方蕾, 粟芳. 中国国情下的保险费率监管模式选择及影响分析——来自车险市场的经验证据[J]. 财经研究, 2016, 42(4): 112–122.
导出参考文献，格式为：
