数字化绿色行为溢出的助推策略及其机理——基于蚂蚁森林情境的研究 -- 上海财经大学期刊社

1 杜松华, 徐嘉泓, 张德鹏, 等. 游戏化如何驱动电商用户绿色消费行为——基于蚂蚁森林的网络民族志研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(2): 191-202.

2 郭国庆, 刘仁杰, 王建国. 蚂蚁森林用户转向线下绿色消费的内在机制研究——基于行为推理理论视角[J]. 管理学刊, 2023, 36(1): 56-69. DOI:10.19808/j.cnki.41-1408/F.2023.0005

3 寇燕, 高敏, 诸彦含, 等. 顾客心理所有权研究综述与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(2): 105-122.

4 凌卯亮, 徐林. 环保领域行为公共政策溢出效应的影响因素——一个实验类研究的元分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2021, 18(2): 95-104,171.

5 秦川申, 田园. 将环境保护游戏化——环保型游戏能够改变公众的环保行为吗?[J]. 公共管理评论, 2021, 3(2): 5-25.

6 孙岩. 居民环境行为及其影响因素研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2006.

7 王建明, 赵婧. 数字时代信息嵌入式监管工具对线上绿色消费行为的推进效应——绿色购买场景模拟和监管工具设计实验[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(4): 142-158. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.04.011

8 徐嘉祺, 佘升翔, 田云章, 等. 回收努力对绿色消费的溢出效应及其影响机理[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 19(3): 94-103.

9 张昆贤, 武常岐, 陈晓蓉, 等. “寓教于乐”: 公众参与环保型游戏是否有助于地区绿色发展?[J]. 公共管理评论, 2022, 4(3): 70-98.

10 Ashford S, Edmunds J, French D P. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis[J]. British Journal of Health Psychology, 2010, 15(2): 265-288. DOI:10.1348/135910709X461752

11 Bem D J. Self-perception theory[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1972, 6: 1-62.

12 Carrico A R, Raimi K T, Truelove H B, et al. Putting your money where your mouth is: An experimental test of pro-environmental spillover from reducing meat consumption to monetary donations[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2018, 50(7): 723-748. DOI:10.1177/0013916517713067

13 De Young R. New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2000, 56(3): 509-526. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00181

14 Dolan P, Galizzi M M. Like ripples on a pond: Behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2015, 47: 1-16. DOI:10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003

15 Du H S, Ke X B, Wagner C. Inducing individuals to engage in a gamified platform for environmental conservation[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2020, 120(4): 692-713.

16 Felix R, Almaguer J. Nourish what you own: Psychological ownership, materialism and pro-environmental behavioral intentions[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2019, 36(1): 82-91. DOI:10.1108/JCM-10-2017-2417

17 Fielding K S, McDonald R, Louis W R. Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2008, 28(4): 318-326. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003

18 Fuchs C, Prandelli E, Schreier M. The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2010, 74(1): 65-79. DOI:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65

19 Galizzi M M, Whitmarsh L. How to measure behavioral spillovers: A methodological review and checklist[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10: 342. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00342

20 Huang H P. Media use, environmental beliefs, self-efficacy, and pro-environmental behavior[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(6): 2206-2212. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.031

21 Johe M H, Bhullar N. To buy or not to buy: The roles of self-identity, attitudes, perceived behavioral control and norms in organic consumerism[J]. Ecological Economics, 2016, 128: 99-105. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.019

22 Lacasse K. Don’t be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 48: 149-158. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006

23 Lam S P. Predicting intention to save water: Theory of planned behavior, response efficacy, vulnerability, and perceived efficiency of alternative solutions[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2006, 36(11): 2803-2824. DOI:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00129.x

24 Lanzini P, Thøgersen J. Behavioural spillover in the environmental domain: An intervention study[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, 40: 381-390. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.006

25 Lauren N, Fielding K S, Smith L, et al. You did, so you can and you will: Self-efficacy as a mediator of spillover from easy to more difficult pro-environmental behaviour[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 48: 191-199. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.004

26 Lauren N, Smith L D G, Louis W R, et al. J. Promoting spillover: How past behaviors increase environmental intentions by cueing self-perceptions[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2019, 51(3): 235-258. DOI:10.1177/0013916517740408

27 Mi L Y, Xu T, Sun Y H, et al. Playing Ant Forest to promote online green behavior: A new perspective on uses and gratifications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 278: 111544. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111544

28 Peck J, Kirk C P, Luangrath A W, et al. Caring for the commons: Using psychological ownership to enhance stewardship behavior for public goods[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2021, 85(2): 33-49. DOI:10.1177/0022242920952084

29 Peck J, Shu S B. The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2009, 36(3): 434-447. DOI:10.1086/598614

30 Peck J, Shu S B. Psychological ownership and consumer behavior[M]. Cham: Springer, 2018.

31 Pierce J L, Kostova T, Dirks K T. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research[J]. Review of General Psychology, 2003, 7(1): 84-107. DOI:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

32 Preston S D, Gelman S A. This land is my land: Psychological ownership increases willingness to protect the natural world more than legal ownership[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2020, 70: 101443. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101443

33 Rabinovich A, Morton T A, Postmes T, et al. Think global, act local: The effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2009, 29(4): 391-399. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.004

34 Silver W S, Mitchell T R, Gist M E. Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1995, 62(3): 286-299. DOI:10.1006/obhd.1995.1051

35 Steinhorst J, Klöckner C A, Matthies E. Saving electricity -for the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2015, 43: 125-135. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012

36 Steinhorst J, Matthies E. Monetary or environmental appeals for saving electricity? -Potentials for spillover on low carbon policy acceptability[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 93: 335-344. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.020

37 Stern P C. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior[J]. Journal of Social Issues, 2000, 56(3): 407-424. DOI:10.1111/0022-4537.00175

38 Süssenbach S, Kamleitner B. Psychological ownership as a facilitator of sustainable behaviors[A]. Peck J, Shu S B. Psychological ownership and consumer behavior[M]. New York: Springer, 2018.

39 Tabernero C, Hernández B. Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2011, 43(5): 658-675. DOI:10.1177/0013916510379759

40 Thøgersen J. Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 1999, 20(1): 53-81. DOI:10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9

41 Thøgersen J, Crompton T. Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning[J]. Journal of Consumer Policy, 2009, 32(2): 141-163. DOI:10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1

42 Thøgersen J, Ölander F. Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23(3): 225-236. DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5

43 Truelove H B, Carrico A R, Weber E U, et al. Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 29: 127-138. DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004

44 Truelove H B, Yeung K L, Carrico A R, et al. From plastic bottle recycling to policy support: An experimental test of pro-environmental spillover[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2016, 46: 55-66. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.004

45 van der Werff E, Steg L, Keizer K. Follow the signal: When past pro-environmental actions signal who you are[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2014, a,40: 273-282.

46 van der Werff E, Steg L, Keizer K. I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2014, b,46(5): 626-657.

47 van Dyne L, Pierce J L. Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004, 25(4): 439-459. DOI:10.1002/job.249

48 Venhoeven L A, Bolderdijk J W, Steg L. Explaining the paradox: How pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being[J]. Sustainability, 2013, 5(4): 1372-1386. DOI:10.3390/su5041372

49 Wang H L, Ma Y, Yang S X, et al. The spillover influence of household waste sorting on green consumption behavior by mediation of environmental concern: Evidence from rural China[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(23): 9110. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17239110

50 Wei S, Xu J Q, She S X, et al. Are recycling people also saving? Costliness matters[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 11: 609371. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609371

51 Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S. Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(3): 305-314. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003

52 Wood R, Bandura A. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989, 56(3): 407-415. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407

53 Xie X H, Lu Y, Gou Z H. Green building pro-environment behaviors: Are green users also green buyers?[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(10): 1703. DOI:10.3390/su9101703

54 Yang Z J, Kong X C, Sun J, et al. Switching to green lifestyles: Behavior change of ant forest users[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(9): 1819. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15091819

55 Zhang Y X, Xiao S Q, Zhou G H. User continuance of a green behavior mobile application in China: An empirical study of ant forest[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242: 118497. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118497