10942 
8024颠覆性创新不但与既有技术范式和制度逻辑冲突， 而且还与创新有关群体分歧严重，其合法性是创新研究的重要前沿理论课题。本文综述了颠覆性创新合法性研究成果并指出了未来的研究方向。首先，分析了创新合法性评价者视角兴起的现实背景与理论意义，评述了该研究视角下创新利益相关者价值冲突内容与特点，总结了基于利益相关者价值冲突的颠覆性创新合法性理论内涵。其次，评述了颠覆性创新利益相关者物质利益、精神价值与道德规范冲突对其合法性的挑战，回顾了颠覆性创新合法性动态演化驱动机制、市场选择与扩散机制等有关研究。再次，综述了颠覆性创新合法性研究对于企业家创新战略行动的关注，总结了颠覆性创新利益相关者价值冲突与企业家战略行动互动关系，提出了基于利益相关者价值冲突视角的颠覆性创新合法性与企业家创新战略行动理论分析框架。本文为颠覆性创新合法性研究提供参考，为颠覆性创新实践提供借鉴。
颠覆性创新合法性与企业家战略行动：研究述评与展望
摘要
参考文献
2 Binz C, Harris-Lovett S, Kiparsky M, et al. The thorny road to technology legitimation — institutional work for potable water reuse in California[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2016, 103: 249-263 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.005
3 Bitektine A, Haack P. The " macro” and the " micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process[J]. Academy of Management Review,2015, 40(1): 49-75 DOI:10.5465/amr.2013.0318
5 Bunduchi R. Legitimacy-seeking mechanisms in product innovation: A qualitative study[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2017, 34(3): 315-342 DOI:10.1111/jpim.2017.34.issue-3
6 Geels F W, Verhees B. Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945-1986)[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2011, 78(6): 910-930 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.004
7 Govindarajan V, Kopalle P K, Danneels E. The effects of mainstream and emerging customer orientations on radical and disruptive innovations[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2011, 28(S1): 121-132 DOI:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00865.x
8 Hall J, Matos S V, Martin M J C. Innovation pathways at the Base of the Pyramid: Establishing technological legitimacy through social attributes[J]. Technovation,2014, 34(5-6): 284-294 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.003
11 Jiao H, Zhao G Z. When will employees embrace managers’ technological innovations? The mediating effects of employees’ perceptions of fairness on their willingness to accept change and its legitimacy[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2014, 31(4): 780-798 DOI:10.1111/jpim.2014.31.issue-4
12 Klenner P, Hüsig S, Dowling M. Ex-ante evaluation of disruptive susceptibility in established value networks—When are markets ready for disruptive innovations?[J]. Research Policy,2013, 42(4): 914-927 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.12.006
13 Lankoski L, Smith N C, van Wassenhove L. Stakeholder judgments of value[J]. Business Ethics Quarterly,2016, 26(2): 227-256 DOI:10.1017/beq.2016.28
16 Osiyevskyy O, Dewald J. Explorative versus exploitative business model change: The cognitive antecedents of firm‐level responses to disruptive innovation[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal,2015, 9(1): 58-78 DOI:10.1002/sej.v9.1
17 Parry M E, Kawakami T. The encroachment speed of potentially disruptive innovations with indirect network externalities: The case of E-readers[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management,2017, 34(2): 141-158 DOI:10.1111/jpim.2017.34.issue-2
18 Pérez L, Dos Santos Paulino V, Cambra-Fierro J. Taking advantage of disruptive innovation through changes in value networks: Insights from the space industry[J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,2017, 22(2): 97-106 DOI:10.1108/SCM-01-2017-0017
19 Roy R. Role of relevant lead users of mainstream product in the emergence of disruptive innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2018, 129: 314-322 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.036
20 Scherer A G, Palazzo G, Seidl D. Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2013, 50(2): 259-284 DOI:10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-2
21 Sood A, Tellis G J. Demystifying disruption: A new model for understanding and predicting disruptive technologies[J]. Marketing Science,2011, 30(2): 339-354 DOI:10.1287/mksc.1100.0617
23 Tripsas M, Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2000, 21(10-11): 1147-1161 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
25 Von Pechmann F, Midler C, Maniak R, et al. Managing systemic and disruptive innovation: Lessons from the Renault Zero Emission Initiative[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change,2015, 24(3): 677-695 DOI:10.1093/icc/dtv018
26 Voronov M, de Clercq D, Hinings C R. Conformity and distinctiveness in a global institutional framework: The legitimation of Ontario fine wine[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2013, 50(4): 607-645 DOI:10.1111/joms.2013.50.issue-4
28 Wan F, Williamson P J, Yin E D. Antecedents and implications of disruptive innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Technovation,2015, 39-40: 94-104 DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.012
29 Wood D J. Measuring corporate social performance: A review[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2010, 12(1): 50-84 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.2010.12.issue-1
30 Yu D, Hang C C. A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews,2010, 12(4): 435-452 DOI:10.1111/ijmr.2010.12.issue-4
31 Zhang W, White S. Overcoming the liability of newness: Entrepreneurial action and the emergence of China’s private solar photovoltaic firms[J]. Research Policy,2016, 45(3): 604-617 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.005
32 Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Review,2002, 27(3): 414-431 DOI:10.5465/amr.2002.7389921
引用本文
郁培丽, 刘沐洋, 潘培尧. 颠覆性创新合法性与企业家战略行动：研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(3): 111-125.
导出参考文献，格式为：
下一篇：联盟关系断裂研究述评与未来展望
