4145 
7530联合投资是风险投资机构一种常见的策略选择，能有效地提高机构决策质量、促进初创企业成长。本文以中国1 015家风险投资机构在2000年至2016年间的投资数据为样本，分析了风险投资人的工作流动对风险投资机构间联合投资关系的影响，探讨了地理距离、过往合作关系的调节作用。研究结果表明，风险投资人的工作流动能够促进原任职机构和现任职机构之间联合投资关系的形成；两家机构之间的地理距离越远、过往合作越少，风险投资人个人网络对机构间关系的影响越明显，人员流动对联合投资的促进作用也就越强。本研究加深了对中国情境下风险投资人个人网络、机构间网络互动过程的理解，兼具理论意义和实践价值。
人员流动对风险投资机构联合投资的影响——基于中国风险投资行业的实证研究
摘要
参考文献
1 董静, 汪立, 吴友. 地理距离与风险投资策略选择——兼论市场环境与机构特质的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论,2017, (2): 4-16. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2017.02.002
2 黄福广, 贾西猛, 田莉. 风险投资机构高管团队知识背景与高科技投资偏好[J]. 管理科学,2016, (5): 31-44. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2016.05.003
3 龙玉, 赵海龙, 张新德, 等. 时空压缩下的风险投资——高铁通车与风险投资区域变化[J]. 经济研究,2017, (4): 195-208. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5863.2017.04.070
5 Bermiss Y S, Greenbaum B E. Loyal to whom? The effect of relational embeddedness and managers’ mobility on market tie dissolution[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2016, 61(2): 254-290. DOI:10.1177/0001839215619198
6 Bermiss Y S, Murmann J P. Who matters more? The impact of functional background and top executive mobility on firm survival[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2015, 36(11): 1697-1716. DOI:10.1002/smj.2320
7 Campbell B A, Ganco M, Franco A M, et al. Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2012, 33(1): 65-87. DOI:10.1002/smj.v33.1
8 Chatterji A K, De Figueiredo Jr R J P, Rawley E. Learning on the job? Employee mobility in the asset management industry[J]. Management Science,2016, 62(10): 2804-2819. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2276
9 Ewens M, Rhodes-Kropf M. Is a VC partnership greater than the sum of its partners?[J]. The Journal of Finance,2015, 70(3): 1081-1113. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12249
10 Gompers P A, Mukharlyamov V, Xuan Y H. The cost of friendship[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2016, 119(3): 626-644. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.013
11 Gu Q, Lu X H. Unraveling the mechanisms of reputation and alliance formation: A study of venture capital syndication in China[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2014, 35(5): 739-750. DOI:10.1002/smj.2014.35.issue-5
12 Hochberg Y V, Lindsey L A, Westerfield M M. Resource accumulation through economic ties: Evidence from venture capital[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2015, 118(2): 245-267. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.06.008
13 Jain A. Learning by hiring and change to organizational knowledge: Countering obsolescence as organizations age[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2016, 37(8): 1667-1687. DOI:10.1002/smj.2016.37.issue-8
14 Liu Y, Maula M. Local partnering in foreign ventures: Uncertainty, experiential learning, and syndication in cross-border venture capital investments[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(4): 1407-1429. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0835
15 Mawdsley J K, Somaya D. Employee mobility and organizational outcomes: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda[J]. Journal of Management,2016, 42(1): 85-113. DOI:10.1177/0149206315616459
16 Tan D, Rider C I. Let them go? How losing employees to competitors can enhance firm status[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2017, 38(9): 1848-1874. DOI:10.1002/smj.2017.38.issue-9
17 Zhang L, Gupta A K, Hallen B L. The conditional importance of prior ties: A group-level analysis of venture capital syndication[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017, 60(4): 1360-1386. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.1088
18 Zhelyazkov P I, Gulati R. After the break-up: The relational and reputational consequences of withdrawals from venture capital syndicates[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(1): 277-301. DOI:10.5465/amj.2013.0768
引用本文
沈睿, 余雷, 路江涌. 人员流动对风险投资机构联合投资的影响——基于中国风险投资行业的实证研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(5): 44-57.
导出参考文献，格式为：
