9114 
4237本文从年报可读性视角，探究交易所问询函对董事联结公司年报可读性的治理作用。研究发现，财务报告问询函能够发挥显著的监管效果，不仅提高收函公司（发讯公司）年报可读性，而且促使与收函公司具有董事联结关系的上市公司（受讯公司）改善年报披露行为。尤其是当投资者关注度高、媒体报道多和产品市场竞争激烈的公司被问询时，受讯公司会更大幅度提高年报可读性。作用机理检验证实，财务报告问询函降低收函公司盈余管理、增加违规成本，对收函公司年报可读性产生直接影响；同时，基于联结董事对信息的传递并出于对其声誉的维护，问询函对受讯公司年报可读性产生间接影响。本文将问询函影响的范围从收函公司本身拓展至具有董事联结的公司，探讨交易所问询监管能否发挥间接治理效果，为完善证券市场监管模式、提高市场监管效率提供了新的思路。
财务问询函能够提高年报可读性吗？——来自董事联结上市公司的经验证据
摘要
参考文献
1 任宏达, 王琨. 社会关系与企业信息披露质量——基于中国上市公司年报的文本分析[J]. 南开管理评论,2018, (5): 128-138. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2018.05.014
3 王克敏, 王华杰, 李栋栋, 等. 年报文本信息复杂性与管理者自利——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 管理世界,2018, (12): 120-132. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.12.011
5 张俊生, 汤晓建, 李广众. 预防性监管能够抑制股价崩盘风险吗?——基于交易所年报问询函的研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2018, (10): 112-126. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2018.10.009
6 张娆. 企业间高管联结与会计信息质量: 基于企业间网络关系的研究视角[J]. 会计研究,2014, (4): 27-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2014.04.004
7 Bens D A, Cheng M, Neamtiu M. The impact of SEC disclosure monitoring on the uncertainty of fair value estimates[J]. The Accounting Review,2016, 91(2): 349-375. DOI:10.2308/accr-51248
8 Bozanic Z, Dietrich J R, Johnson B A. SEC comment letters and firm disclosure[J]. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2017, 36(5): 337-357. DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.07.004
9 Brown S V, Tian X, Tucker J W. The spillover effect of SEC comment letters on qualitative corporate disclosure: Evidence from the risk factor disclosure[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2018, 35(2): 622-656. DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12414
10 Cai Y, Sevilir M. Board connections and M&A transactions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2012, 103(2): 327-349. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017
11 Cai Y, Dhaliwal D S, Kim Y, et al. Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2014, 19(3): 1086-1119. DOI:10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0
13 Chiu P C, Teoh S H, Tian F. Board interlocks and earnings management contagion[J]. The Accounting Review,2013, 88(3): 915-944. DOI:10.2308/accr-50369
14 Dechow P M, Alastair L, James R. SEC comment letters and insider sales[J]. The Accounting Review,2016, 91(2): 401-439. DOI:10.2308/accr-51232
15 Dimaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review,1983, 48(2): 147-160. DOI:10.2307/2095101
16 Huang X, Teoh S H, Zhang Y L. Tone management[J]. The Accounting Review,2014, 89(3): 1083-1113. DOI:10.2308/accr-50684
17 Johnston R, Petacchi R. Regulatory oversight of financial reporting: Securities and exchange commission comment letters[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2017, 34(2): 1128-1155. DOI:10.1111/1911-3846.12297
18 Leuz C, Nanda D, Wysocki P D. Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2003, 69(3): 505-527. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1
19 Li F. Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2008, 45(2-3): 221-247. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
20 Loughran T, McDonald B. Measuring readability in financial disclosures[J]. Journal of Finance,2014, 69(4): 1643-1671. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12162
21 Lo K, Ramos F, Rogo R. Earnings management and annual report readability[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2017, 63(1): 1-25. DOI:10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.002
22 Maheswaran D, Meyers-Levy J. The influence of message framing and issue involvement[J]. Journal of Marketing Research,1990, 27(3): 361-367. DOI:10.1177/002224379002700310
23 McNichols M, Trueman B. Public disclosure, private information collection, and short-term trading[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,1994, 17(1-2): 69-94. DOI:10.1016/0165-4101(94)90005-1
24 Miller G S. The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud[J]. Journal of Accounting,2006, 44(5): 1001-1033. DOI:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00224.x
25 Robinson J R, Xue Y F, Yu Y. Determinants of disclosure noncompliance and the effect of the SEC Review: Evidence from the 2006 mandated compensation disclosure regulations[J]. The Accounting Review,2011, 86(4): 1415-1444. DOI:10.2308/accr-10033
26 Serfling M. Firing costs and capital structure decisions[J]. The Journal of Finance,2016, 71(5): 2239-2286. DOI:10.1111/jofi.12403
27 Stuart T E, Yim S. Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2010, 97(1): 174-190. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.03.012
29 Zaichkowsky J L. Measuring the involvement construct[J]. Journal of Consumer Research,1985, 12(3): 341-352. DOI:10.1086/208520
引用本文
翟淑萍, 王敏, 白梦诗. 财务问询函能够提高年报可读性吗？——来自董事联结上市公司的经验证据[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2020, 42(9): 136-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：组织韧性：最新文献评述
