2652 
2947网络直播作为另类经济模式何以产生重大社会影响？文章基于准社会交往理论，探索了秀场直播的社群互动机制。文章通过采集斗鱼平台的直播数据，发现主播与观众的商品化亲密关系越强，其揽获的直播打赏收入越高。这说明两者之间的情感互动是促成打赏的重要原因。文章进一步通过门槛回归模型识别了竞争式打赏和跟随式打赏两种互动模式。研究发现，头部观众打赏额的增加在竞争模式下挤出了非头部观众打赏，抑制了主播收入的提升；在跟随模式下则带动了非头部观众打赏，促进了主播收入的提升。此外，主播的个人信息披露在竞争模式下有助于提升打赏收入，在跟随模式下则相反。其可能的解释是，前者强化了社群互动而激发打赏，后者则削弱了头部观众的信息优势而弱化打赏。文章的研究解释了直播打赏的社会化理论逻辑，揭示出直播经济的运行规律在于准社会交往机制，这对于完善数字社区治理具有重要的政策启示。
直播经济中的准社会交往机制——来自斗鱼平台的经验证据
摘要
参考文献
1 鲍德里亚. 拟仿物与拟像[M]. 洪浚译. 中国台北: 时报文化出版公司, 1998.
4 廖理,王新程,王正位,等. 网红直播打赏收入影响因素的实证研究[J]. 金融研究,2021,(8):138−151.
5 孟陆,刘凤军,陈斯允,等. 我可以唤起你吗−不同类型直播网红信息源特性对消费者购买意愿的影响机制研究[J]. 南开管理评论,2020,(1):131−143. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2020.01.013
6 戈夫曼. 日常生活中的自我呈现[M]. 冯钢译. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2016.
7 涂永前,熊赟. 情感制造:泛娱乐直播中女主播的劳动过程研究[J]. 青年研究,2019,(4):1−12.
9 Abidin C, Thompson E C. Buymylife. com: Cyber-femininities and commercial intimacy in blogshops[J]. Women’s Studies International Forum,2012,35(6): 467−477. DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2012.10.005
10 Bourdieu. Language and symbolic power[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
11 Cao J W, Zhang G H, Liu D, et al. Influencing factors of users’ shift to buying expensive virtual gifts in live streaming: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Frontiers in Psychology,2022,13: 997651. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997651
12 Cialdini R B, Goldstein N J. Social influence: Compliance and conformity[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,2004,55: 591−621. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
13 Cristofari C, Guitton M J. Aca-fans and fan communities: An operative framework[J]. Journal of Consumer Culture,2017,17(3): 713−731. DOI:10.1177/1469540515623608
14 Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes[J]. Human Relations,1954,7(2): 117−140. DOI:10.1177/001872675400700202
15 Fiske J. The cultural economy of fandom[M]. London: Routledge, 1992.
16 Hamilton W A, Garretson O, Kerne A. Streaming on twitch: Fostering participatory communities of play within live mixed media[A]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems[C]. Toronto: ACM, 2014.
17 Hansen B E. Sample splitting and threshold estimation[J]. Econometrica,2000,68(3): 575−603. DOI:10.1111/1468-0262.00124
18 Hochschild A R. The commercialization of intimate life: Notes from home and work[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
19 Horton D, Wohl R R. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance[J]. Psychiatry,1956,19(3): 215−229. DOI:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
20 Hou F F, Guan Z Z, Li B Y, et al. Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming: Evidence from China[J]. Internet Research,2020,30(1): 141−163.
21 Hu M, Zhang M L, Wang Y. Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2017,75: 594−606. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.006
22 Kim J, Song H. Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: A mediating role of social presence[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2016,62: 570−577. DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083
23 Li Y, Peng Y. What drives gift-giving intention in live streaming? The perspectives of emotional attachment and flow experience[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,2021,37(14): 1317−1329. DOI:10.1080/10447318.2021.1885224
24 Lo P S, Dwivedi Y K, Tan G W H, et al. Why do consumers buy impulsively during live streaming? A deep learning-based dual-stage SEM-ANN analysis[J]. Journal of Business Research,2022,147: 325−337. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.013
25 Lomanowska A M, Guitton M J. Online intimacy and well-being in the digital age[J]. Internet Interventions,2016,4: 138−144. DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2016.06.005
26 Marwick A, Boyd D. To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter[J]. Convergence,2011,17(2): 139−158. DOI:10.1177/1354856510394539
27 McMillan D W, Chavis D M. Sense of community: A definition and theory[J]. Journal of Community Psychology,1986,14(1): 6−23. DOI:10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
28 Rubin A M, Perse E M, Powell R A. Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing[J]. Human Communication Research,1985,12(2): 155−180. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x
29 Sokolova K, Kefi H. Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,2020,53: 101742. DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011
30 Thorne S, Bruner G C. An exploratory investigation of the characteristics of consumer fanaticism[J]. Qualitative Market Research,2006,9(1): 51−72. DOI:10.1108/13522750610640558
31 Wan J L, Lu Y B, Wang B, et al. How attachment influences users’ willingness to donate to content creators in social media: A socio-technical systems perspective[J]. Information & Management,2017,54(7): 837−850.
32 Wohn D Y, Freeman G, McLaughlin C. Explaining viewers’ emotional, instrumental, and financial support provision for live streamers[A]. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems[C]. Montreal: ACM, 2018.
33 Xiang L, Zheng X B, Lee M K O, et al. Exploring consumers’ impulse buying behavior on social commerce platform: The role of parasocial interaction[J]. International Journal of Information Management,2016,36(3): 333−347. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.002
34 Yan Q, Yang F. From parasocial to parakin: Co-creating idols on social media[J]. New Media & Society,2021,23(9): 2593−2615.
引用本文
曾雪云, 费一洋. 直播经济中的准社会交往机制——来自斗鱼平台的经验证据[J]. 财经研究, 2023, 49(12): 136-148.
导出参考文献，格式为：
