数字化创新:内涵特征、价值创造与展望

A Literature Review of Digital Innovation: Concept and Value Creation

谢卫红,林培望,李忠顺,郭海珍

2020 第 42 卷 第 09 期 页码 19-31

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200601.401

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

数字化创新是指不同主体对数字化资源进行重新组合的活动,以产生新的产品、服务、流程、商业模式。通过对数字化创新领域核心期刊论文进行内容分析,归纳了数字化创新过程和结果两个视角下的概念内涵,厘清了数字化创新的技术和管理两方面的特征,比较了数字化创新与IS创新、IT创新的区别,对数字化创新价值创造的机理归纳了主体、架构、行动三方面的理论解释,并梳理了其价值创造的效率、融合、生成三种方式,结合数字化创新的重要意义,讨论了数字化创新未来研究的方向。本文的研究有助于系统性梳理数字化创新的知识脉络,有助于促进数字化创新的进一步研究。

With the rapid development of new generation ICT such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, cloud computing, big data and Internet of things, innovation activities can no longer be conducted by pre-determined participants according to the traditional linear process. In digital economy, the enterprise can use more and more resources. Based on this, the enterprise needs to develop new capabilities, strategies, systems, etc., in order to meet the personalized needs of users. The innovation model, known as “digital innovation”, reshapes physical products and the logic of value creation of enterprises, and even reshapes the form of business. Actually there is a lack of research in digital innovation based on value creation. This paper systematically reviews the researches on digital innovation at home and abroad, which provides a useful reference for accelerating the research on digital innovation and carrying out digital innovation practice in China. It focuses on the following three questions: “what is digital innovation” “why can it create value” and “how to create value”. In terms of “what is digital innovation”, this paper introduces the concept, definition, characteristics of digital innovation and relationship with IT innovation. On the aspect of “why can digital innovation create value”, this paper explains and develops the theory from the three perspectives of subject, structure and action. In terms of “how to create value”, this paper sorts out three ways: efficiency, convergence and generativity. Although some new studies have recognized that the stages of digital innovation are not clearly defined, the theoretical framework does not reflect this. The existing research also fails to clearly explain the value creation logic of digital innovation. Through the content analysis of the literature, this paper summarizes the concept connotation of digital innovation from different perspectives, summarizes its characteristics, and sorts out the connection and difference between digital innovation, IS innovation and IT innovation. On this basis, the theoretical perspective and mechanism of value creation of digital innovation are sorted out. Finally, the future research of digital innovation is prospected from the perspectives of research level, research method, research theory and research object. To sum up, this paper believes that digital innovation research has developed from the discussion stage of basic issues such as concept definition to the research stage of multiple perspectives such as analysis of causes and consequences, and is forming an integrated analysis framework. In terms of concept connotation, the definition of digital innovation gradually turns to comprehensive consideration from the dichotomy of result and process. The theory of value creation is explained and developed from three perspectives: subject, architecture and action. In terms of the way of value creation, there are three ways: efficiency, integration and production. Around the three questions of digital innovation mentioned above, the contribution of this paper is mainly manifested in three aspects: First, through content analysis and systemic literature review, the digital innovation research at home and abroad are reviewed; Second, it provides a useful reference for accelerating the research and practice of digital innovation in China; Third, it summarizes the shortcomings of existing researches on digital innovation, and proposes specific and feasible research directions in many aspects, which lay a foundation for future researches on digital innovation by domestic scholars.

参考文献

1 陈国青, 吴刚, 顾远东, 等. 管理决策情境下大数据驱动的研究和应用挑战——范式转变与研究方向[J]. 管理科学学报,2018, (7): 1-10. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2018.07.001
2 戴亦舒, 叶丽莎, 董小英, 等. CPS与未来制造业的发展: 中德美政策与能力构建的比较研究[J]. 中国软科学,2018, (2): 11-20. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-9753.2018.02.002
5 肖静华, 吴瑶, 刘意, 等. 消费者数据化参与的研发创新——企业与消费者协同演化视角的双案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2018, (8): 154-173, 192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.08.012
6 杨善林, 周开乐. 大数据中的管理问题: 基于大数据的资源观[J]. 管理科学学报,2015, (5): 1-8. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2015.05.001
7 余江, 孟庆时, 张越, 等. 数字创新: 创新研究新视角的探索及启示[J]. 科学学研究,2017, (7): 1103-1111. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2017.07.016
9 Adner R. Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy[J]. Journal of Management,2017, 43(1): 39-58. DOI:10.1177/0149206316678451
10 Adomavicius G, Bockstedt J C, Gupta A, et al. Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: A design science approach[J]. MIS Quarterly,2008, 32(4): 779-809. DOI:10.2307/25148872
11 Akaka M A, Vargo S L. Technology as an operant resource in service(eco)systems[J]. Information Systems and E-Business Management,2014, 12(3): 367-384. DOI:10.1007/s10257-013-0220-5
12 Arakji R Y, Lang K R. Digital consumer networks and producer-consumer collaboration: Innovation and product development in the video game industry[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2007, 24(2): 195-219. DOI:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240208
13 Austin R D, Devin L, Sullivan E E. Accidental innovation: Supporting valuable unpredictability in the creative process[J]. Organization Science,2012, 23(5): 1505-1522. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1110.0681
14 Barrett M, Davidson E, Prabhu J, et al. Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions[J]. MIS Quarterly,2015, 39(1): 135-154. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39:1.03
15 Barrett M, Oborn E, Orlikowski W J, et al. Reconfiguring boundary relations: Robotic innovations in pharmacy work[J]. Organization Science,2012, 23(5): 1448-1466. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1100.0639
16 Boland R J, Lyytinen K, Yoo Y. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction[J]. Organization Science,2007, 18(4): 631-647. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0304
17 Chesbrough H W, Appleyard M M. Open innovation and strategy[J]. California Management Review,2007, 50(1): 57-76. DOI:10.2307/41166416
18 Constantinides P, Henfridsson O, Parker G G. Introduction-platforms and infrastructures in the digital age[J]. Information Systems Research,2018, 29(2): 381-400. DOI:10.1287/isre.2018.0794
19 Fichman R G, Nambisan S, Halpern M. Configurational thinking and value creation from digital innovation: The case of product lifecycle management implementation[A]. Rowe F, Te’eni D. Innovation and IT in an international context[M]. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014a.
20 Fichman R G, Santos B L D, Zheng Z Q. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum[J]. MIS Quarterly,2014b, 38(2): 329-353. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.01
21 Fichman R G. Real options and IT platform adoption: Implications for theory and practice[J]. Information Systems Research,2004, 15(2): 132-154. DOI:10.1287/isre.1040.0021
22 Flath C M, Friesike S, Wirth M, et al. Copy, transform, combine: Exploring the remix as a form of innovation[J]. Journal of Information Technology,2017, 32(4): 306-325. DOI:10.1057/s41265-017-0043-9
23 Gao L S, Iyer B. Analyzing complementarities using software stacks for software industry acquisitions[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2006, 23(2): 119-147. DOI:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230206
24 Gawer A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework[J]. Academy of Management Proceedings,2014, 2014(1): 11751. DOI:10.5465/ambpp.2014.278
25 Grover V, Kohli R. Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for Multifirm environments[J]. MIS Quarterly,2012, 36(1): 225-232. DOI:10.2307/41410415
26 Henfridsson O, Mathiassen L, Svahn F. Managing technological change in the digital age: The role of architectural frames[J]. Journal of Information Technology,2014, 29(1): 27-43. DOI:10.1057/jit.2013.30
27 Henfridsson O, Nandhakumar J, Scarbrough H, et al. Recombination in the open-ended value landscape of digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(2): 89-100. DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.03.001
28 Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., & Greenwood Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(1): 52-61. DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
29 Hitt L M, Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value[J]. MIS Quarterly,1996, 20(2): 121-142. DOI:10.2307/249475
30 Huang J, Henfridsson O, Liu M J, et al. Growing on steroids: Rapidly scaling the user base of digital ventures through digital innovation[J]. MIS Quarterly,2017, 41(1): 301-314. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.16
31 Jacobides M G, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2018, 39(8): 2255-2276. DOI:10.1002/smj.2904
32 Jahanmir S F, Cavadas J. Factors affecting late adoption of digital innovations[J]. Journal of Business Research,2018, 88: 337-343. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.058
33 Jeyaraj A, Rottman J W, Lacity M C. A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research[J]. Journal of Information Technology,2006, 21(1): 1-23. DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056
34 Kallinikos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A. The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts[J]. MIS Quarterly,2013, 37(2): 357-370. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02
35 Kohli R, Grover V. Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems,2008, 9(1): 23-39. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00147
36 Kohli R, Melville N P. Digital innovation: A review and synthesis[J]. Information Systems Journal,2019, 29(1): 200-223. DOI:10.1111/isj.12193
37 Lehrer C, Wieneke A, Vom Brocke J, et al. How big data analytics enables service innovation: Materiality, affordance, and the individualization of service[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems,2018, 35(2): 424-460. DOI:10.1080/07421222.2018.1451953
38 Lusch R F, Nambisan S. Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective[J]. MIS Quarterly,2015, 39(1): 155-175. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
39 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly,2017, 41(1): 223-238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
40 Nambisan S. Architecture vs. Ecosystem perspectives: Reflections on digital innovation[J]. Information and Organization,2018, 28(2): 104-106. DOI:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.04.003
41 Orlikowski W J. Material knowing: The scaffolding of human knowledgeability[J]. European Journal of Information Systems,2006, 15(5): 460-466. DOI:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000639
42 Parker G G, Van Alstyne M W. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design[J]. Management Science,2005, 51(10): 1494-1504. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
43 Sarker S, Sarker S, Sahaym A, et al. Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study[J]. MIS Quarterly,2012, 36(1): 317-338. DOI:10.2307/41410419
44 Scholz J, Smith A N. Augmented reality: Designing immersive experiences that maximize consumer engagement[J]. Business Horizons,2016, 59(2): 149-161. DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.10.003
46 Susarla A, Oh J H, Tan Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube[J]. Information Systems Research,2012, 23(1): 23-41. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0339
47 Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How volvo cars managed competing concerns[J]. MIS Quarterly,2017, 41(1): 239-253. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12
48 Tilson D, Lyytinen K, Sørensen C. Research commentary-digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(4): 748-759. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0318
49 Vaccaro A, Brusoni S, Veloso F M. Virtual design, problem framing, and innovation: An empirical study in the automotive industry[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2011, 48(1): 99-122. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00939.x
50 Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing[J]. Journal of Marketing,2004, 68(1): 1-17. DOI:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
51 Von Briel F, Davidsson P, Recker J. Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2018, 42(1): 47-69. DOI:10.1177/1042258717732779
52 Yoo Y, Boland Jr R J, Lyytinen K, et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization Science,2012, 23(5): 1398-1408. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
53 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary-the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research,2010, 21(4): 724-735. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0322
54 Yoo Y. Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing[J]. MIS Quarterly,2010, 34(2): 213-231. DOI:10.2307/20721425