非比较国际创业实证研究现状评析和未来展望

A Review of Empirical Literature of Non-comparative International Entrepreneurship and Future Prospects

马鸿佳，宋春华，刘艳艳

2016 第 38 卷第 02 期页码 16-32

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2016.02.002

摘要

近些年来,国际创业逐渐成为创业研究的焦点之一,许多学者开始致力于国际创业的研究,并取得了众多有益的研究成果。根据当前文献研究,学者将国际创业划分为非比较国际创业和比较国际创业两个分支,其中非比较国际创业是国际创业研究的一个重要分支。本文从理论基础、研究方法以及切入视角三个方面对近十年取得的研究成果进行了系统的梳理和评述,同时指出当前研究中存在的不足,并对非比较国际创业研究提出了未来研究方向。

In recent years,international entrepreneurship (IE) has been the focus in entrepreneurship research. Many scholars make efforts to study international entrepreneurship and gain many beneficial research achievements. Based on current literature research,scholars have classified international entrepreneurship into two branches,namely non-comparative international entrepreneurship and comparative international entrepreneurship. Especially,non-comparative international entrepreneurship is an important branch of international entrepreneurship research. Through the aspects of theoretical basis,research methods and cut-in perspectives,this paper systematically sorts out the research achievements in recently ten years. Finally,it points out the limitations of current study,and puts forward the future research directions in non-comparative international entrepreneurship.

关键词： 国际创业,非比较国际创业,比较国际创业,实证研究

参考文献

1 Al-Aali A and Teece D J. International entrepreneurship and the theory of the (long-lived) international firm:A Capabilities perspective. Entrepreneurship:Theory & Practice, 2014, 38(1): 95–116

2 Anabel F M and Joaquín A. Entrepreneurial orientation and export intensity:Examining the interplay of organizational learning and innovation. International Business Review, 2015, 1(24): 148–156

3 Antonio N G, Arturo C M S and Manuel R M. Antecedents and consequences of export entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 2015, 68(7): 1532–1538

4 Cavusgil S T and Knight G. The born global firm:An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(1): 3–16

5 Coviello N E. The network dynamics of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 2006, 37(5): 713–731

6 De Clercq D, Sapienza H J and Zhou. Entrepreneurial strategic posture and learning effort in international ventures:The moderating roles of operational flexibilities. International Business Review, 2014, 23(5): 981–992

7 De Clercq D and Zhou L X. Entrepreneurial Strategic Posture and Performance in Foreign Markets:The Critical Role of International Learning Effort. Journal of International Marketing, 2014, 2(22): 47–67

8 Di Gregorio D, Musteen M and Thomas D E. Offshore outsourcing as a source of international competitiveness for SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009, 6(40): 969–988

9 Diego M, et al. Effects of network market orientation on new ventures' international performance. [J]International Journal of Business Environment, 2013, 5(3): 268–298

10 Dimitratos P, Amorós J E and Etchebarne M S. Micro-multinational or not International entrepreneurship,networking and learning effects. .Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(5): 908–915

11 Ellis P D. Social ties and international entrepreneurship:Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 2011, 42(1): 99–127

12 Freeman S, Edwards R and Schroder B. How smaller born-global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization. Journal of International Marketing, 2006, 14(3): 33–63

13 Gassmann O and Keupp M M. The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalizing SMEs in the biotechnology industry:a knowledge-based view. Journal of World Business, 2007, 42(3): 350–366

14 Glavas C and Mathews S. How international entrepreneurship characteristics influence Internet capabilities for the international business processes of the firm. International Business Review, 2014, 23(1): 228–245

15 Gleasona K C and Wiggenhornb J. Born globals,the choice of globalization strategy,and the market's perception of performance. Journal of World Business, 2007, 42(3): 322–335

16 Hånell S M, et al. International entrepreneurship research during the last decade:a review. Journal for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 2013, 7(2): 116–138

17 Hessels Jand Van S A. Entrepreneurship,export orientation,and economic growth. Small Business Economics,, 2011, 37(2): 255–268

18 Hsu W T, Chen H L and Cheng C Y. Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs:The moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 2013, 48(1): 1–12

19 Hutzschenreuter T and Horstkotte J. Performance effects of international expansion processes:The moderating role of top management team experiences. International Business Review, 2013, 22(1): 259–277

20 Isidor R, et al. The impact of structural and attitudinal antecedents on the instability of international joint ventures:The mediating role of asymmetrical changes in commitment. International Business Review, 2015, 24(2): 298–310

21 Jantunena A, et al. Strategic orientations of born globals-Do they really matter?. Journal of World Business, 2008, 43(2): 158–170

22 Khanin D, Ogilvie K and Leibsohn D. International entrepreneurship,venture capital networks,and reinvestment decisions. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2012, 10(1): 1–24

23 L iu, H , et al. Strategic flexibility and international venturing by emerging market firms:The moderating effects of institutional and relational factors. Journal of International Marketing, 2013, 21(2)

24 Loane S and Bell J. Rapid internationalisation among entrepreneurial firms in Australia,Canada,Ireland and New Zealand:an extension to the network approach. International Marketing Review, 2006, 23(5): 467–485

25 Manolova T S, Manev I M and Gyoshev B S. Friends with money? Owner's financial network and new venture internationalization in a transition economy. International Small Business Journal, 2014, 32(8): 944–966

26 Maria R and Andreu B. International new ventures as "small multinationals":The importance of marketing capabilities. Journal of World Business, 2012, 47(2): 277–287

27 Maria R, Andreu B and Diego M. Factors enhancing the choice of higher resource commitment entry modes in international new ventures. International Business Review, 2012, 21(4): 648–666

28 Martina M, John F and Datta D K. The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance:A study of Czech SMEs. Journal of World Business, 2010, 45(3): 197–205

29 Natasha E, Svante A and Martin H. Stakeholders and Marketing Capabilities in International New Ventures:Evidence from Ireland,Sweden,and Denmark. Journal of International Marketing, 2012, 20(4): 46–71

30 Nielsen B B and Nielsen S. The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making:The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 2011, 46(2): 185–193

31 O'Cass A and Weerawardena J. Examining the role of international entrepreneurship,innovation and international market performance in SME internationalisation. European Journal of Marketing, 2009, 43(11-12): 1325–1348

32 Oviatt B M and McDougall P P. Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2005, 29(5): 537–553

33 Park T and Rhee J. Antecedents of knowledge competency and performance in Born Globals:the moderating effects of absorptive capacity. Management Decision, 2012, 50(8): 1361–1381

34 Terjesen S, Hessels J and Li D. Comparative International Entrepreneurship:A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 2013, 42(1): 299–344

35 Thurner T W, Gershman M and Roud V. Partnerships as internationalization strategy:Russian entrepreneurs between local restrictions and global opportunities. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2015, 13(2): 118–137

36 Tolstoy D and Agndal H. Network resource combinations in the international venturing of small biotech firms. Technovation, 2010, 30(1): 24–36

37 Tolstoy D. Network development and knowledge creation within the foreign market:A study of international entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2010, 22(5): 379–402

38 Tony WT, et al. Host country executives' assessments of international joint ventures and divestitures:An experimental approach[. Strategic Management Journal,, 2015, 36(1): 254–275

39 Valle S A and Teresa G M. The role of the entrepreneur in identifying international expansion as a strategic opportunity. International Journal of Information Management, 2010, 30(6): 512–520

40 Yiu D W, Lau C M and Bruton G D. International venturing by emerging economy firms:the effects of firm capabilities,home country networks,and corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(4): 519–540

41 Zahra S A and Hayton J C. The effect of international venturing on firm performance:The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 2008, 23(2): 195–220

42 Zahra S A, Wright M and Abdelgawad S G. Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 2014, 32(5): 479–500

43 Zahra S A, Newey L R and Li Y. On the Frontiers:The Implications of Social Entrepreneurship for International Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, 38(1): 137–158

44 Zander I, McDougall C P and Rose E L. Born globals and international business:Evolution of a field of research. Journal of International Business Studies, 2015, 46(1): 27–35

45 Zhou L X and Wu A Q. Earliness of internationalization and performance outcomes:Exploring the moderating effects of venture age and international commitment. Journal of World Business, 2014, 49(1): 132–142

46 Zhou L X Wu W P and Luo X M. Internationalization and the performance of born-global SMEs:the mediating role of social networks. Journal of International Business Studies, 2007, 38(4): 673–690

47 Zhou L X. The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and foreign market knowledge on early internationalization. Journal of World Business, 2007, 42(3): 281–293

48 陈岩, 蒋亦伟, 王锐. 产品多元化战略、企业资源异质性与国际化绩效:对中国2008-2011年制造业上市公司的经验检验. 管理评论, 2014, 26(12): 131–141

49 陈岩, 翟瑞瑞, 韩文征. 国际化战略、逆向技术溢出与企业成长--整合资源与制度视角的中国企业经验分析. 科研管理, 2014, 35(6): 24–32

50 邓新明, et al. 政治关联、国际化战略与企业价值-- 来自中国民营上市公司面板数据的分析. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(1): 26–43

51 杜群阳, et al. 国际化企业创业导向:基于二维分析框架的理论与实证研究. 中国工业经济, 2010 (9): 141–150

52 黄胜, 周劲波. 制度环境、国际市场进入模式与国际创业绩效. 科研管理, 2014, 35(2): 54–61

53 黄胜, 周劲波. 制度环境对国际创业绩效的影响研究. [J]科研管理, 2013, 34(1)

54 黄胜, 周劲波, 丁振阔. 国际创业能力的形成、演变及其对绩效的影响. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(1): 106–117

55 黄胜, 周劲波. 创业机会视角下的中国企业早期国际化研究. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(2): 232–239

56 黄胜, et al. 二元制度环境、制度能力对新兴经济体创业企业加速国际化的影响. 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(3): 71–84

57 李巍, 席小涛. 高管团队国际化经验对民营企业国际化绩效的影响研究--关键战略因素的中介效应. 预测, 2014 (4): 1–7

58 李卫宁, 赵尚科. 创业导向与国际化绩效:基于国外市场知识的中介效应研究. [J]管理学报, 2010, 7(8): 1191–1196

59 李卫宁, 邹俐爱. 天生国际企业创业导向与国际绩效的关系研究. 管理学报, 2010 (6): 819–824

60 王玉荣, 李军, 杨震宁. "天生国际化"企业:股权结构、国际创业与绩效的关系研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(8): 143–149

61 吴晓波, 周浩军. 国际化战略、多元化战略与企业绩效. 科学学研究, 2011 (9): 1331–1341

62 许晖, 郭净. 中国国际化企业能力-战略匹配关系研究:管理者国际注意力的调节作用. 南开管理评论, 2013, 16(4): 133–142

63 许晖, 王琳, 张阳. 国际新创企业创业知识溢出及知识整合机制研究--基于天功国际公司海外员工成长及企业国际化案例. 管理世界, 2015 (6): 141–153

64 许晖, 许守任, 冯永春. 新兴国际化企业的双元平衡及实现路径--基于产品-市场情境矩阵的多案例研究. 管理学报, 2014, 11(8): 1132–1142

65 杨忠, 张骁. 企业国际化程度与绩效关系研究. 经济研究, 2009 (2)

66 于晓宇. 网络能力、技术能力、制度环境与国际创业绩效. 管理科学, 2013, 26(2): 13–27

67 张骁, 李欣. 企业家全球竞争压力感知与企业国际化扩张行为的关系研究. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 5: 74–83

68 郑准, 王国顺. 外部网络结构、知识获取与企业国际化绩效:基于广州制造企业的实证研究. 科学学研究, 2009, 27(8): 1207–1212

69 周劲波, 黄胜, 叶广宇. 组织学习、合法性与国际新创企业进入后速度. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014 (11): 129–141

70 周劲波, 黄胜. 国际社会资本与企业国际化特征关系研究. 科研管理, 2010, 31(1): 46–55

71 周劲波, 黄胜. 制度环境、创业能力对国际创业模式选择的影响. 管理学报, 2015, 12(3): 392–399