数字技术应用与企业技术生态位拓展

Digital Technology Adoption and the Expansion of Corporate Technology Niches

程允,叶江峰,李奉书,操友根

2026 第 48 卷 第 09 期 页码 132-152

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20260416.401

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

摘要

数字技术为企业突破技术路径锁定、深化创新生态嵌入提供了重要支撑,对于拓展企业技术生态位、构建可持续竞争优势具有重要意义。本文基于数字技术可供性理论,利用2010—2023年中国沪深A股上市公司数据,实证检验了数字技术应用对企业技术生态位拓展的影响、作用机制及边界条件。研究发现:(1)数字技术应用能够促进企业技术生态位拓展,这是由于数字技术可供性为企业跨越技术边界、促进多领域技术延伸提供了行动基础;(2)数字技术功能可供性产生的资源整合效应与关系可供性产生的主体协同效应是数字技术应用助力企业技术生态位拓展的关键机制,且二者构成了链式传导机制;(3)外部市场环境和制度环境具有差异化调节效应。市场动态性强化了数字技术应用对企业技术生态位拓展的促进作用,知识产权保护强度则削弱了二者之间的关系。本文不仅拓展了数字技术可供性理论在企业技术生态位演化研究中的适用边界,也为企业在复杂环境下制定数字化导向的技术生态位拓展策略提供了理论依据与实践启示。

Digital technologies provide important support for firms to break through technological path dependence and deepen their embeddedness in innovation ecosystems, which is of great significance for expanding corporate technology niches and building sustainable competitive advantages. Drawing on the digital technology affordance theory, this paper uses data from A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2023 to empirically examine the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which digital technology application affects corporate technology niche expansion. The results show that: (1) Digital technology application promotes corporate technology niche expansion, because digital technology affordance provides an action basis for firms to cross technological boundaries and extend into multiple technological fields. (2) The resource integration effect generated by functional affordance and the actor collaboration effect generated by relational affordance are the key mechanisms through which digital technology application facilitates corporate technology niche expansion, and these two mechanisms further form a chain mediating effect. (3) External market and institutional environments exhibit differentiated moderating effects. Specifically, market dynamism strengthens the positive effect of digital technology application on corporate technology niche expansion, whereas intellectual property protection intensity weakens this effect. This paper not only expands the applicability of the digital technology affordance theory in the study of the evolution of corporate technology niches, but also provides theoretical support and practical implications for firms to formulate digitally-oriented strategies for technology niche expansion in complex environments.

参考文献

1 白景坤, 刘畅. 战略性新兴产业政策与技术重叠——基于企业生态位视角[J]. 经济管理, 2024, 46(7): 20-35. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2024.07.002
2 蔡宏波, 韩金镕. 数字技术应用与企业出口表现——以中关村国家自主创新示范区企业为例[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(5): 58-70.
3 曹如中, 史健勇, 郭华, 等. 区域创意产业创新生态系统演进研究: 动因、模型与功能划分[J]. 经济地理, 2015, 35(2): 107-113. DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2015.02.015
4 曹兴, 李文. 创新网络结构演化对技术生态位影响的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(5): 792-800.
5 曹裕, 李想, 胡韩莉, 等. 数字化如何推动制造企业绿色转型?——资源编排理论视角下的探索性案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(3): 96-112,126,8.
6 陈文瑞, 叶建明, 曹越, 等. 战略联盟与公司税负[J]. 会计研究, 2021, (3): 72-86.
7 杜勇, 曹磊. 科技型企业如何踏上数据机遇跳板实现生态位跃迁——基于不同创业背景企业的双案例研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (1): 170-188. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2024.01.010
8 黄先海, 孙涌铭, 陈梦涛. 企业数字化转型与颠覆性技术创新——来自专利网络与SBERT模型的微观证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (10): 137-154.
9 姜忠辉, 周萌, 罗均梅, 等. 知识协同如何促进企业生态位演化?——基于青岛双星的案例研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2024, 36(3): 84-99. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20230002
10 焦豪, 张睿, 杨季枫. 数字经济情境下企业战略选择与数字平台生态系统构建——基于共演视角的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(12): 201-227.
11 荆文君, 刘璇, 何毅. 跨界经营行为会削弱大型平台企业的竞争优势吗[J]. 财贸经济, 2022, 43(11): 156-172.
12 李晓翔, 张树含. 数字化转型如何影响企业融通创新?[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(4): 41-63. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2023.04.003
13 李玉花, 林雨昕, 李丹丹. 人工智能技术应用如何影响企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (10): 155-173.
14 刘微微, 李昀泽, 毕克新. 绿色技术融合对后发企业非对称赶超的影响研究——基于动态竞合视角[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(8): 95-105. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.08.010
15 罗均梅, 孟朝月, 姜忠辉. 可供性驱动下大企业新事业竞争优势的形成与演化——基于特锐德的纵向案例研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(5): 164-178. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20220046
16 孙冰, 鞠卓芳. 从技术锁定判别中寻求技术突破的可能路径——以光刻技术为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(6): 1223-1236.
17 孙冰, 袭希, 余浩. 网络关系视角下技术生态位态势研究——基于东北三省新能源汽车产业的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(4): 518-528. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2013.04.006
18 孙雅慧, 时省, 彭飞, 等. 研发补贴与渐进式创新锁定: 基于机器学习的专利文本分析[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(11): 89-105.
19 陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5): 68-91.
20 王震, 谢赤. 绿色技术创新如何突破同质壁垒和虹吸效应?[J]. 科学学研究, 2025, 43(5): 1014-1026,1051.
21 吴超鹏, 唐菂. 知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(11): 125-139.
22 吴非, 胡慧芷, 林慧妍, 等. 企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 130-144,10.
23 谢红军, 齐翔. 数字技术与企业价值——基于数字并购场景的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(10): 146-166,9.
24 杨鹏, 尹志锋, 孙宝文. 企业数字技术应用与创新效率提升[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(11): 51-67. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20231129.401
25 姚加权, 张锟澎, 郭李鹏, 等. 人工智能如何提升企业生产效率?——基于劳动力技能结构调整的视角[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(2): 101-116,133,6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.02.006
26 张美扬, 龙小宁. 专利丛林: 科技创新中的绿荫还是荆棘?[J]. 金融研究, 2024, (5): 169-187.
27 张延平, 郭波武, 李世杰, 等. 链主企业如何牵引产业绿色低碳发展?——基于海尔“可持续灯塔工厂”建设的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(6): 199-226,11.
28 赵艺璇, 成琼文, 郭波武. 创新生态系统情境下核心企业跨界扩张的实现机制——社会嵌入视角的纵向单案例分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(6): 52-63.
29 赵艺璇, 余江, 彭密香, 等. 数字创新生态可供性影响跨界创新的组态研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(12): 133-141. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.12.014
30 甄红线, 王玺, 方红星. 知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(11): 62-79.
31 Ahsan T, Mirza S S, Gull A A, et al. How to deal with customer and supplier concentration to attain sustainable financial growth? The role of business strategy[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(7): 4600-4619. DOI:10.1002/bse.3383
32 Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L D W, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(1): 72-95. DOI:10.1002/sej.1266
33 Candiani J A, Gilsing V, Mastrogiorgio M. Technological entry in new niches: Diversity, crowding and generalism[J]. Technovation, 2022, 116: 102478. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102478
34 Caviggioli F. Technology fusion: Identification and analysis of the drivers of technology convergence using patent data[J]. Technovation, 2016, 55-56: 22-32.
35 Chatterjee S, Moody G, Lowry P B, et al. Information Technology and organizational innovation: Harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2020, 29(1): 101596. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101596
36 Curran C S, Leker J. Patent indicators for monitoring convergence-examples from NFF and ICT[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2011, 78(2): 256-273. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021
37 Datta A, Jessup L M. Looking beyond the focal industry and existing technologies for radical innovations[J]. Technovation, 2013, 33(10-11): 355-367. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2013.05.001
38 Dosi G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change[J]. Research Policy, 1982, 11(3): 147-162. DOI:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
39 Du J T, Shen Z Y, Song M L, et al. Nexus between digital transformation and energy technology innovation: An empirical test of A-share listed enterprises[J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 120: 106572. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106572
40 Frank A G, Mendes G H S, Ayala N F, et al. Servitization and industry 4.0 convergence in the digital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 141: 341-351. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.014
41 Hegger D L T, Van Vliet J, Van Vliet B J M. Niche management and its contribution to regime change: The case of innovation in sanitation[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2007, 19(6): 729-746. DOI:10.1080/09537320701711215
42 Jin N, Yang N D, Fawad Sharif S M, et al. Influence of knowledge flow and knowledge stock on the technological niche through absorptive capacity in the R&D network[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2023, 35(12): 1533-1546. DOI:10.1080/09537325.2022.2098101
43 Keijl S, Gilsing V A, Knoben J, et al. The two faces of inventions: The relationship between recombination and impact in pharmaceutical biotechnology[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(5): 1061-1074. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.008
44 Khurshid F, Park W Y, Chan F T S. The impact of competition on vertical integration: The role of technological niche width[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(3): 789-800. DOI:10.1002/bse.2371
45 Levins R. Evolution in changing environments: Some theoretical explorations[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968.
46 Li C M, Xu Y, Zheng H, et al. Artificial intelligence, resource reallocation, and corporate innovation efficiency: Evidence from China’s listed companies[J]. Resources Policy, 2023, 81: 103324. DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103324
47 Li H, Zhang C, Kettinger W J. Digital platform ecosystem dynamics: The roles of product scope, innovation, and collaborative network centrality[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2022, 46(2): 739-770. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2022/15444
48 Liu Y, Dong J Y, Mei L, et al. Digital innovation and performance of manufacturing firms: An affordance perspective[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102458. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102458
49 Liu Y, Wang W, Zhang Z P. The dual drivetrain model of digital transformation: Role of industrial big-data-based affordance[J]. Management Decision, 2022, 60(2): 344-367. DOI:10.1108/MD-12-2019-1664
50 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
51 Nambisan S, Wright M, Feldman M. The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103773. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
52 Pfeffer J, Salancik G R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective[M]. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
53 Podolny J M, Stuart T E, Hannan M T. Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991[J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1996, 102(3): 659-689. DOI:10.1086/230994
54 Pujadas R, Valderrama E, Venters W. The value and structuring role of web APIs in digital innovation ecosystems: The case of the online travel ecosystem[J]. Research Policy, 2024, 53(2): 104931. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104931
55 Richard O C, Wu J, Markoczy L A, et al. Top management team demographic-faultline strength and strategic change: What role does environmental dynamism play?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2019, 40(6): 987-1009. DOI:10.1002/smj.3009
56 Song C H, Elvers D, Leker J. Anticipation of converging technology areas—A refined approach for the identification of attractive fields of innovation[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 116: 98-115. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.001
57 Su Z F, Wang C F, Peng M W. Intellectual property rights protection and total factor productivity[J]. International Business Review, 2022, 31(3): 101956. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101956
58 Sun Z, Zhao L, Mehrotra A, et al. Digital transformation and corporate green innovation: An affordance theory perspective[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025, 34(1): 433-449. DOI:10.1002/bse.3991
59 Vaast E, Safadi H, Lapointe L, et al. Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the gulf of mexico oil spill[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(4): 1179-1205. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.4.08
60 Van Den Oord A, Van Witteloostuijn A. The population ecology of technology: An empirical study of US biotechnology patents from 1976 to 2003[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1): e0169961. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169961
61 Verstegen L, Houkes W, Reymen I. Configuring collective digital-technology usage in dynamic and complex design practices[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(8): 103696. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.020
62 Wang W, Sun Z Y, Wang W J, et al. The impact of environmental uncertainty on ESG performance: Emotional vs. rational[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 397: 136528. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136528
63 Xie X M, Liu X J, Blanco C. Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 191: 122473. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122473
64 Xie X M, Wang H W. How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 124: 299-311. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.058
65 Zahra S A, Liu W, Si S. How digital technology promotes entrepreneurship in ecosystems[J]. Technovation, 2023, 119: 102457. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102457
66 Zhang T J, Tse S Y, Wang D T, et al. The effect of distributors’ relationship exploration on relationship quality under market uncertainty[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2021, 93: 344-355. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.12.005
67 Zhang X X, Gao C Y, Zhang S C. The niche evolution of cross-boundary innovation for Chinese SMEs in the context of digital transformation——Case study based on dynamic capability[J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 68: 101870. DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101870
68 Zhao S C, Zeng D M, Li J, et al. Quantity or quality: The roles of technology and science convergence on firm innovation performance[J]. Technovation, 2023, 126: 102790. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102790
69 Zhong C B, Huang R, Duan Y L, et al. Exploring the impacts of knowledge recombination on firms’ breakthrough innovation: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2024, 28(3): 698-723. DOI:10.1108/JKM-08-2022-0623
70 Zhu Y Y, Yu D. Digital transformation and firms’ bargaining power: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2024, 183: 114851. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114851