全球跨境数字并购:距离还重要吗?

Global Cross-border Digital M&As: Does Distance Still Matter?

谢红军,齐翔

2026 第 52 卷 第 07 期 页码 124-138

DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20260416.202

PDF全文下载 HTML全文

语音预告

摘要

距离一直是制约传统跨境并购的关键因素,但对于数字技术变革所催生的跨境数字并购热潮,一种观点认为,数字技术进步使世界变“平”,距离对跨境数字并购已不再重要;另一种观点则认为,数字技术反而可能使跨境数字并购对距离更为敏感。对此,文章基于全球跨境数字并购数据,试图回答两个问题:距离对跨境数字并购是否仍然具有影响?数字技术如何影响距离与跨境数字并购的关系?研究发现:(1)地理距离与制度距离的增加显著且稳健地抑制了跨境数字并购规模,其主要原因在于距离增加提高了数字并购成本,并放大了数字情境下的政治风险。(2)距离的抑制效应会随着经济发展阶段、距离水平、文化情境以及数字并购类型的不同而发生变化。(3)尽管数字技术能够弱化地理距离的负面影响,却始终无法缓解制度距离的抑制作用。文章结论不仅深化了对距离在跨境数字并购中重要性的理解,也对数字技术如何重塑企业国际化布局具有重要的理论与实践意义。

Distance is a key factor constraining traditional cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As). However, with the boom in cross-border digital M&As triggered by digital technological transformation, one view holds that advances in digital technologies have made the world “flat”, so that distance is no longer important for cross-border digital M&As; the other view argues that digital technologies may make cross-border digital M&As more sensitive to distance. To resolve this debate, this paper uses global data on cross-border digital M&As and adopts the Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation method to systematically answer the following two questions: (1) Does distance still affect cross-border digital M&As? (2) How do digital technologies affect the relationship between distance and cross-border digital M&As?

The study finds that increases in geographic and institutional distance significantly and robustly inhibit the flow of cross-border digital M&As. The main reason is that greater distance intensifies the costs of digital M&As and amplifies political risks in the digital context. Moreover, the inhibiting effect of distance varies with the stage of economic development, the level of distance, the cultural context, and the type of digital M&As. Although digital technologies can weaken the negative effect of geographic distance, they cannot alleviate the inhibiting effect of institutional distance.

This paper makes the following contributions: First, it is the first to use a large global sample to systematically test the decisive impact of distance on the emerging phenomenon of cross-border digital M&As, thus providing new evidence on the determinants of cross-border digital M&As. Second, it reveals the important impact of geographic and institutional distance on cross-border digital M&As, and explains the mechanisms from both costs and risks induced by distance, thereby extending the research on the relationship between distance and cross-border investment. Third, it examines the heterogeneous effects from the stage of economic development, cultural distance, and the level of distance, and analyzes the moderating effect of digital technologies, thus more comprehensively revealing the contexts where distance affects cross-border digital M&As in the era of the digital economy, and providing useful implications for enterprises to optimize the location choices of cross-border digital M&As and for governments to improve digital governance and international investment policies.

参考文献

1 陈怀超, 范建红. 制度距离、中国跨国公司进入战略与国际化绩效: 基于组织合法性视角[J]. 南开经济研究, 2014, (2): 99−117. DOI:10.14116/j.nkes.2014.02.005
2 方慧, 赵甜. 中国企业对“一带一路”国家国际化经营方式研究——基于国家距离视角的考察[J]. 管理世界, 2017, (7): 17−23. DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2017.07.002
3 蒋殿春, 唐浩丹. 数字型跨国并购: 特征及驱动力[J]. 财贸经济, 2021, (9): 129−144. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2021.09.009
4 蒋冠宏, 蒋殿春. 中国对外投资的区位选择: 基于投资引力模型的面板数据检验[J]. 世界经济, 2012, (9): 21−40. DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2012.09.003
5 刘青, 陶攀, 洪俊杰. 中国海外并购的动因研究——基于广延边际与集约边际的视角[J]. 经济研究, 2017, (1): 28−43.
6 马述忠, 陈逸凡, 吴鹏. 数字服务税、市场机会与数字型跨境并购[J]. 世界经济, 2025, (12): 90−118. DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2025.12.002
7 马述忠, 沈雨婷, 房超. 数字型跨国并购增长的制度动因——以ITA拓展协议为例[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2026, (3): 1−18. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-4670.2026.03.001
10 谢红军, 蒋殿春. 竞争优势、资产价格与中国海外并购[J]. 金融研究, 2017, (1): 83−98.
11 谢红军, 齐翔. 数字技术与企业价值——基于数字并购场景的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, (10): 146−166. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2025.10.009
12 晏艳阳, 汤会登. 东道国媒体情绪对中国企业跨境并购的影响研究[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2023, (1): 158−174. DOI:10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2023.01.007
13 詹晓宁, 欧阳永福. 数字经济下全球投资的新趋势与中国利用外资的新战略[J]. 管理世界, 2018, (3): 78−86. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2018.03.007
14 钟小浜, 赵志强, 王健俊. 数字化跨境并购对企业高质量技术创新的影响——来自零售业上市公司的证据[J]. 科研管理, 2025, (8): 101−110. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.08.010
15 祝继高, 梁晓琴, 曲馨怡. 标准互联互通与企业对外直接投资: 基于对外投资风险视角[J]. 财经研究, 2023, (9): 138−153. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.20230517.102
16 Akerman A, Leuven E, Mogstad M. Information frictions, internet, and the relationship between distance and trade[J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2022, 14(1): 133−163. DOI:10.1257/app.20190589
17 Bick P, Crook M D, Lynch A A, et al. Does distance matter in mergers and acquisitions?[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2017, 40(1): 33−54. DOI:10.1111/jfir.12115
18 Buckley P J, Clegg L J, Cross A R, et al. The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009, 40(2): 353−354. DOI:10.1057/jibs.2008.102
19 Carrère C, De Melo J, Wilson J. The distance puzzle and low‐income countries: An update[J]. Journal of Economic Surveys, 2013, 27(4): 717−742. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2011.00715.x
20 Ellis J A, Moeller S B, Schlingemann F P, et al. Portable country governance and cross-border acquisitions[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2017, 48(2): 148−173. DOI:10.1057/s41267-016-0029-9
21 Erel I, Liao R C, Weisbach M S. Determinants of cross‐border mergers and acquisitions[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(3): 1045−1082. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01741.x
22 Hanelt A, Firk S, Hildebrandt B, et al. Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2021, 30(1): 3−26. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2020.1747365
23 Jin G Z, Leccese M, Wagman L. M&A and technological expansion[J]. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2024, 33(2): 338−359. DOI:10.3386/w31126
24 Lendle A, Olarreaga M, Schropp S, et al. There goes gravity: eBay and the death of distance[J]. The Economic Journal, 2016, 126(591): 406−441. DOI:10.1111/ecoj.12286
25 Luo Y D, Tung R L. A general theory of springboard MNEs[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018, 49(2): 129−152. DOI:10.1057/s41267-017-0114-8
26 Ragozzino R, Reuer J J. Geographic distance and corporate acquisitions: Signals from IPO firms[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2011, 32(8): 876−894. DOI:10.1002/smj.914
27 Tambe P, Hitt L M, Brynjolfsson E. The extroverted firm: How external information practices affect innovation and productivity[J]. Management Science, 2012, 58(5): 843−859. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1446
28 Trąpczyński P, Gorynia M. A double-edged sword? The moderating effects of control on firm capabilities and institutional distance in explaining foreign affiliate performance[J]. International Business Review, 2017, 26(4): 697−709. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.009
29 Xie E, Reddy K S, Liang J. Country-specific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions[J]. Journal of World Business, 2017, 52(2): 127−183. DOI:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005
30 Zhu H, Xia J, Makino S. How do high-technology firms create value in international M&A? Integration, autonomy and cross-border contingencies[J]. Journal of World Business, 2015, 50(4): 718−728. DOI:10.1016/j.jwb.2015.01.001

数据公开

标题文件大小下载
数据及程序代码 4.3 MB