构建中国住房保障自主知识体系:概念、理论与模式
Constructing an Indigenous Knowledge System for Housing Security in China: Concepts, Theories, and Models
DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.04.002
[1]乔贝,姚玲珍,张莉.构建中国住房保障自主知识体系:概念、理论与模式[J/OL].上海财经大学学报,2026,28(04):19-31[2026-11-11].https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jsufe.2026.04.002.
摘要
当前,我国已建成世界上规模最大的住房保障体系,并正以保障对象分层覆盖、多主体协同供给、配租与配售并行为特征加速推进。文章对中国特色住房保障实践进行经验总结和理论提炼,从标识性概念、理论内核以及实践模式三个层面探索中国住房保障自主知识体系的构建。在概念层面,强调我国住房保障的核心特征与术语标准;在理论层面,基于以人民为中心的共同富裕导向,构建公平与效率统一的双重属性分析框架以及生存、发展和共享递进统一的三重目标体系;在实践层面,坚持问题导向,聚焦供需匹配、财政可持续与治理现代化等现实议题,以期为我国住房保障模式的进一步完善提供理论指导,也为其他发展中国家的住房治理实践贡献中国方案。
China has established the world’s largest housing security system, characterized by stratified coverage of beneficiary groups, coordinated provision by multiple actors, and parallel implementation of rental-based and sale-based allocation mechanisms. Grounded in the institutional evolution and practical experience of China’s housing security system, this paper systematically reflects on the limitations of applying Western housing security frameworks within the Chinese context. It further proposes a strategy for constructing an indigenous knowledge system for housing security in China from the perspectives of concepts, theories, and models. At the conceptual level, this paper advocates a structurally grounded and hierarchically organized taxonomy. “Affordable housing” is defined as the overarching institutional category, within which two principal branches—rental-based and sale-based provisions—are distinguished. They are further specified into concrete subtypes, including public rental housing, government-subsidized rental housing, shared-ownership housing, and closed-management affordable housing. This paper also emphasizes the standardization of terminology and its capacity for cross-contextual dialogue. At the theoretical level, this paper advances a core framework summarized as “one center, dual attributes, and three objectives”. “One center” refers to a people-centered orientation toward common prosperity, clarifying the fundamental question of “housing security is provided for whom”. “Dual attributes” highlight the dialectical unity of equity and efficiency, addressing the central tension between social protection and economic development. “Three objectives” encompass a progression from ensuring basic shelter (subsistence goal), to achieving adequate and livable housing (development goal), and ultimately to promoting shared prosperity (collective goal). Together, these elements form an internally coherent explanatory logic for the housing security system. At the level of practical models, this paper adopts a problem-oriented approach and focuses on three pressing issues in China’s current housing security practice. First, supply-demand alignment, which involves resolving structural mismatches in beneficiary identification, spatial distribution, and policy instrument design. Second, fiscal sustainability, which calls for an analytical framework covering cost estimation, financing mechanisms, asset management, and risk monitoring, with a particular focus on innovative approaches such as converting existing housing stock into affordable housing. Third, governance modernization, which emphasizes the development of a multi-actor governance system through improvements in organizational structures, coordination mechanisms, and performance evaluation. This paper provides theoretical guidance for further improving China’s housing security models and offers a “Chinese solution” to housing governance challenges in other developing countries.
关键词: 住房保障,中国范式,自主知识体系,配租与配售