市场需求对于促进新能源汽车产业的创新发展至关重要,中国新能源汽车市场需求主要包括“政府采购”“商业运营”和“私人乘用”三类。文章基于2007−2019年中国新能源汽车板块上市公司的面板数据,运用倾向得分匹配法分析了三类市场需求对于新能源车企技术创新的激励效应及作用机制。分析结果表明:①三类需求对车企的技术创新均存在激励作用,但其激励效果存在时滞性与差异性,不同阶段由不同的市场需求发挥创新激励主导作用。②新能源汽车市场需求主要通过集聚效应与竞争效应机制影响新能源汽车市场竞争与配套基础设施建设,进而影响车企的技术创新。③政商关联会通过影响竞争效应和集聚效应来调节新能源汽车市场需求的激励效应,且不同的政商关联程度对需求创新激励机制的影响也存在差异。文章的研究在统筹协调三类需求、发挥好需求创新激励的竞争效应与集聚效应、实现市场主导与政府调控的有机结合等方面有着重要的政策启示意义。
新能源汽车异质性需求的创新激励效应及作用机制——“政府采购”“商业运营”与“私人乘用”需求比较的视角
摘要
参考文献
5 梁任敏,蒙昱竹,赵庆. 技术进步的内求或外求−兼论市场机制与政府调控[J]. 科研管理,2020,(12):70−81.
13 Acemoglu D,Linn J. Market size in innovation:Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2004,119(3): 1049−1090. DOI:10.1162/0033553041502144
15 Aschhoff B,Sofka W. Innovation on demand—Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?[J]. Research Policy,2009,38(8): 1235−1247. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.011
16 Atkeson A,Burstein A T. Innovation,firm dynamics,and international trade[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2010,118(3): 433−484. DOI:10.1086/653690
17 Auty R M. Sustaining development in mineral economies: The resource curse thesis[M]. London: Routledge, 1993.
18 Boubakri N,Cosset J C,Saffar W. Political connections of newly privatized firms[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,2008,14(5): 654−673. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.08.003
19 Combes P P,Duranton G,Gobillon L,et al. The productivity advantages of large cities:Distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection[J]. Econometrica,2012,80(6): 2543−2594. DOI:10.3982/ECTA8442
20 Di Stefano G,Gambardella A,Verona G. Technology push and demand pull perspectives in innovation studies:Current findings and future research directions[J]. Research Policy,2012,41(8): 1283−1295. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021
21 Egbue O,Long S. Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles:An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions[J]. Energy Policy,2012,48: 717−729. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
22 Fan J P H, Huang J, Morck R, et al. Vertical integration, institutional determinants and impact: Evidence from China[R]. NBER Working Papers No. 14650, 2009.
23 Fontana R,Nuvolari A,Shimizu H,et al. Reassessing patent propensity:Evidence from a dataset of R&D awards,1977-2004[J]. Research Policy,2013,42(10): 1780−1792. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.014
24 Griliches Z. Hybrid corn:An exploration in the economics of technological change[J]. Econometrica,1957,25(4): 501−522. DOI:10.2307/1905380
25 Guerzoni M,Raiteri E. Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies:Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix[J]. Research Policy,2015,44(3): 726−747. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009
26 Kern F,Rogge K S,Howlett M. Policy mixes for sustainability transitions:New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies[J]. Research Policy,2019,48(10): 103832. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
27 Li C R,Lin C J,Chu C P. The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations[J]. Management Decision,2008,46(7): 1002−1026. DOI:10.1108/00251740810890186
28 Li J L,Wachs M. The effects of federal transit subsidy policy on investment decisions:The case of San Francisco’s Geary Corridorr[J]. Transportation,2004,31(1): 43−67. DOI:10.1023/B:PORT.0000007235.21442.d1
29 Li S J,Kahn M E,Nickelsburg J. Public transit bus procurement:The role of energy prices,regulation and federal subsidies[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2015,87: 57−71. DOI:10.1016/j.jue.2015.01.004
30 Li W B,Long R Y,Chen H. Consumers’ evaluation of national new energy vehicle policy in China:An analysis based on a four paradigm model[J]. Energy Policy,2016,99: 33−41. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.050
31 Melitz M J,Ottaviano G I P. Market size,trade,and productivity[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2008,75(1): 295−316. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x
32 Myers S, Marquis D G. Successful industrial innovations: A study of factors underlying innovation in selected firms[M]. California: National Science Foundation, 1969.
33 Nie Y Y,Wang E,Guo Q X,et al. Examining Shanghai consumer preferences for electric vehicles and their attributes[J]. Sustainability,2018,10(6): 2036. DOI:10.3390/su10062036
34 Perdiguero J,Jiménez J L. Sell or not sell biodiesel:Local competition and government measures[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2011,15(3): 1525−1532. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.028
35 Peress J. Product market competition,insider trading,and stock market efficiency[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(1): 1−43. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01522.x
36 Peters M,Schneider M,Griesshaber T,et al. The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change–Does the locus of policies matter?[J]. Research Policy,2012,41(8): 1296−1308. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.004
37 Rosenbaum P R,Rubin D B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J]. Biometrika,1983,70(1): 41−55. DOI:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
38 Schmookler J. Invention and economic growth[M]. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.
39 Wang L,Fu Z L,Guo W,et al. What influences sales market of new energy vehicles in China? Empirical study based on survey of consumers’ purchase reasons[J]. Energy Policy,2020,142: 111484. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111484
40 Yang S,Cheng P,Li J,et al. Which group should policies target? Effects of incentive policies and product cognitions for electric vehicle adoption among Chinese consumers[J]. Energy Policy,2019,135: 111009. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111009
41 Yu Z,Li S J,Tong L. Market dynamics and indirect network effects in electric vehicle diffusion[J]. Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment,2016,47: 336−356. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2016.06.010
引用本文
熊勇清, 王溪. 新能源汽车异质性需求的创新激励效应及作用机制——“政府采购”“商业运营”与“私人乘用”需求比较的视角[J]. 财经研究, 2021, 47(7): 48-62.
导出参考文献,格式为: