21 
11已有研究关于社会资本投资对农户收入的影响存在一定争议。文章以“万企帮万村”这个社会资本扶贫行动作为研究对象，在构建农户决策模型分析框架的基础上，利用全国农村固定观察点调查数据，使用DID方法系统考察了该行动对农户收入的影响。研究发现，“万企帮万村”扶贫行动使受益农户收入显著提高，约为735元。这种增收效应主要来源于农业经营收入增长，是由农业经营回报率和农户生产要素投入变化共同导致的。同时，“万企帮万村”扶贫行动更多地使收入水平、人力资本水平相对较低的农户受益，缓解了农户收入不平等，具有偏向低收入农户的分配效应。此外，“万企帮万村”扶贫行动对农户收入具有提升效应，这对农户消费也产生了积极影响。因此，像“万企帮万村”这样投资于那些能把农户纳入现代农业产业链分工的项目可能是既增加农户收入又改善分配的有效方案之一，而“万企帮万村”扶贫行动是一项具有明显益贫性和普惠性的社会资本投资行动，其能够提升低收入农户收入以及缩小不同群体间相对收入差距，从而促进共同富裕。
社会资本投资的增收与分配效应——来自“万企帮万村”扶贫行动的证据
摘要
参考文献
11 Baird S, McIntosh C, Özler B, et al. Asset transfers and anti-poverty programs: Experimental evidence from tanzania[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2024, 166: 103182. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103182
12 Bellemare M F, Wichman C J. Elasticities and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2020, 82(1): 50−61. DOI:10.1111/obes.12325
13 Cao G Y, Liu C R, Zhou L A. Suing the government under weak rule of law: Evidence from administrative litigation reform in China[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2023, 222: 104895. DOI:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104895
14 Deininger K, Byerlee D. The rise of large farms in land abundant countries: Do they have a future?[J]. World Development, 2012, 40(4): 701−714. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.030
15 Egger D, Haushofer J, Miguel E, et al. General equilibrium effects of cash transfers: Experimental evidence from Kenya[J]. Econometrica, 2022, 90(6): 2603−2643. DOI:10.3982/ECTA17945
16 Herrmann R T. Large-scale agricultural investments and smallholder welfare: A comparison of wage labor and outgrower channels in Tanzania[J]. World Development, 2017, 90: 294−310. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.007
17 Huang K X, You Y X. Evaluating the impact of the fourth round of China’s poverty alleviation program[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2025, 107(2): 583−610. DOI:10.1111/ajae.12495
18 Kakwani N. The relative deprivation curve and its applications[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1984, 2(4): 384−394.
19 Liu S Y, Ma S, Yin L J, et al. Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2023, 165: 103165. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103165
20 McKague K, Wheeler D, Karnani A. An integrated approach to poverty alleviation: Roles of the private sector, government and civil society[A]. Bitzer V, Hamann R, Hall M, et al. The business of social and environmental innovation: New frontiers in Africa[M]. Cham: Springer, 2015.
21 Nanhthavong V, Bieri S, Nguyen A T, et al. Proletarianization and gateways to precarization in the context of land-based investments for agricultural commercialization in Lao PDR[J]. World Development, 2022, 155: 105885. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105885
22 Pace N, Sebastian A, Daidone S, et al. Cash transfers’ role in improving livelihood diversification strategies and well-being: Short- and medium-term evidence from Zimbabwe[J]. World Development, 2022, 154: 105874. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105874
23 Roth J, Sant’Anna P H C, Bilinski A, et al. What's trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2023, 235(2): 2218−2244. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008
24 Thondhlana G. Land acquisition for and local livelihood implications of biofuel development in Zimbabwe[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 49: 11−19. DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.025
25 Wang X L, Ye Y Y. Government-initiated corporate social responsibility and performance growth—evidence from enterprise engagement in targeted poverty alleviation in China[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2024, 84: 102284. DOI:10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102284
引用本文
王常伟, 谭家银, 顾海英. 社会资本投资的增收与分配效应——来自“万企帮万村”扶贫行动的证据[J]. 财经研究, 2026, 52(3): 4-18.
导出参考文献，格式为：
