技术要素市场化与企业全要素生产率——基于国家技术转移中心设立的视角
Technological Factor Marketization and Corporate Total Factor Productivity: A Perspective Based on the Establishment of National Technology Transfer Centers
DOI: 10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20260226.201
引用本文（GB/T 7714-2025）
[1]刘晨,吕可夫.技术要素市场化与企业全要素生产率——基于国家技术转移中心设立的视角[J/OL].外国经济与管理,2026,48(07):82-99[2026-11-11].https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20260226.201.
摘要
技术要素市场化既是完善市场经济体制的重要内容，也是实现高水平科技自立自强、加快构建新发展格局的重要手段。本文以国家技术转移中心设立作为技术要素市场化的冲击场景，考察技术要素市场化对企业全要素生产率的影响。研究发现，技术要素市场化能够显著提升企业全要素生产率。机制检验发现，上述效应主要通过推动技术溢出、激励企业创新、深化专业化分工得以实现。异质性分析发现，对于获得政府补助较多、隶属高科技行业、所在行业竞争程度较高以及所在地区产品市场发育程度较高的企业，技术要素市场化对企业全要素生产率的促进作用更加明显。本文的研究结论具有重要的理论和实践意义，不仅为技术要素市场化的微观经济效应提供新的见解，也为政府部门推动企业生产效率提升提供经验证据。
Technological factor marketization is a cornerstone of refining the market economy and a key instrument for achieving high-level tech self-reliance and fostering a new development paradigm. Taking the establishment of National Technology Transfer Centers as a quasi-natural experiment, this paper examines the impact of technological factor marketization on corporate total factor productivity (TFP). The results show that technological factor marketization significantly boosts TFP. Mechanism testing indicates that this effect is mainly achieved through enhanced technology spillovers, increased corporate innovation, and a deeper division of labor. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the promotion effect is more pronounced for firms with higher government innovation subsidies, those in high-tech and highly competitive industries, and those located in regions with a more mature market for technological outcomes. The findings of this paper not only offer novel insights into the microeconomic consequences of technological factor marketization, but also provide robust empirical evidence to guide policy-making aimed at fostering firm growth.
关键词： 技术要素市场化,技术转移,全要素生产率,企业专利
参考文献
4 胡珺, 方祺, 龙文滨. 碳排放规制、企业减排激励与全要素生产率——基于中国碳排放权交易机制的自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4): 77-94.
5 黄勃, 李海彤, 江萍, 等. 战略联盟、要素流动与企业全要素生产率提升[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(10): 195-211. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2022.10.023
6 龙小宁, 刘灵子, 张靖. 企业合作研发模式对创新质量的影响——基于中国专利数据的实证研究[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (10): 174-192.
7 吕桁宇, 马春爱, 汤桐, 等. 政府创新补助对工业企业碳强度影响路径研究——一个链式多重中介模型检验[J]. 会计研究, 2024, (4): 150-164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2024.04.011
8 邱煜, 伍勇强, 唐曼萍. 数字化转型与企业供应链依赖[J]. 中国软科学, 2023, (10): 215-224.
9 邵汉华, 王瑶, 罗俊. 技术市场发展促进了产学研深度融合吗?[J]. 管理评论, 2022, 34(11): 99-108.
10 石琦, 肖淑芳, 吴佳颖. 股票期权及其要素设计与企业创新产出——基于风险承担与业绩激励效应的研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(2): 27-38,62.
11 王嘉鑫. 强制性内部控制审计、企业创新与经济增长[J]. 会计研究, 2020, (5): 166-177. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2020.05.012
12 韦钦文, 孙宁华. 技术市场发展赋能高技术企业创新效率的效应与机制研究[J]. 管理学报, 2025, 22(7): 1289-1297.
13 吴伟伟, 张天一. 非研发补贴与研发补贴对新创企业创新产出的非对称影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 137-160.
14 谢红军, 张禹, 洪俊杰, 等. 鼓励关键设备进口的创新效应——兼议中国企业的创新路径选择[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (4): 100-118. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2021.04.006
15 徐巍, 梁上坤, 钱宇航. 资本市场出清与实体经济投资——基于上市公司强制退市的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(8): 185-200. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2025.08.012
16 余明桂, 王俐璇, 赵文婷, 等. 专利质押、融资约束与企业劳动雇佣[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2022, 39(9): 70-93. DOI:10.13653/j.cnki.jqte.2022.09.009
17 于荣光, 王宏伟. 技术市场对我国高技术产业创新链的影响[J]. 经济与管理, 2025, 39(1): 58-68.
18 袁淳, 肖土盛, 耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工: 专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021, (9): 137-155.
19 郑曼妮, 黎文靖, 谭有超. 技术转移与企业高质量创新[J]. 世界经济, 2024, 47(3): 66-93. DOI:10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2024.03.006
20 Acemoglu D. Directed technical change[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(4): 781-809. DOI:10.1111/1467-937X.00226
21 Audretsch D B, Feldman M P. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production[J]. The American Economic Review, 1996, 86(3): 630-640.
22 Azagra-Caro J M, Barberá-Tomás D, Edwards-Schachter M, et al. Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(2): 463-474. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.011
23 Bergh P, Thorgren S, Wincent J. Entrepreneurs learning together: The importance of building trust for learning and exploiting business opportunities[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2011, 7(1): 17-37. DOI:10.1007/s11365-009-0120-9
24 Caviggioli F, Ughetto E. The drivers of patent transactions: Corporate views on the market for patents[J]. R& D Management, 2013, 43(4): 318-332. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2144107
25 Cengiz D, Dube A, Lindner A, et al. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2019, 134(3): 1405-1454. DOI:10.1093/qje/qjz014
26 Coase R H. The nature of the firm[J]. Economica, 1937, 4(16): 386-405. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
27 De Chaisemartin C, D’Haultfoeuille X. Two-way fixed effects estimators with heterogeneous treatment effects[J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110(9): 2964-2996. DOI:10.1257/aer.20181169
28 De Marco A, Scellato G, Ughetto E, et al. Global markets for technology: Evidence from patent transactions[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(9): 1644-1654. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.015
29 De Rassenfosse G, Grazzi M, Moschella D, et al. International patent protection and trade: Transaction-level evidence[J]. European Economic Review, 2022, 147: 104160. DOI:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104160
30 Ding X G, Sheng Z L, Appolloni A, et al. Digital transformation, ESG practice, and total factor productivity[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2024, 33(5): 4547-4561. DOI:10.1002/bse.3718
31 Du H B, Liang X J, Yu M Y, et al. How does ESG dimensional imbalance affect firm innovation?[J]. Technovation, 2026, 150: 103439. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103439
32 Fang H S, Zhang X F, Guo L. Productivity effects of corporate income tax: Evidence from China[J]. The World Economy, 2023, 46(6): 1815-1842. DOI:10.1111/twec.13328
33 Figueroa N, Serrano C J. Patent trading flows of small and large firms[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(7): 1601-1616. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.002
34 Galasso A, Schankerman M, Serrano C J. Trading and enforcing patent rights[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2013, 44(2): 275-312. DOI:10.1111/1756-2171.12020
35 Gao P, Lei Y H. Communication infrastructure and stabilizing food prices: Evidence from the telegraph network in China[J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2021, 13(3): 65-101. DOI:10.1257/app.20190416
36 Goodman-Bacon A. Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225(2): 254-277. DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014
37 Han P F, Liu C R, Tian X. Does trading spur specialization? evidence from patenting[J]. Management Science, 2026, 72(5): 4419-4434. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03174
38 Harhoff D, Scherer F M, Vopel K. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights[J]. Research Policy, 2003, 32(8): 1343-1363. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5
39 Hegde D, Luo H. Patent publication and the market for ideas[J]. Management Science, 2018, 64(2): 652-672. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2622
40 Jin P Z, Mangla S K, Song M L. The power of innovation diffusion: How patent transfer affects urban innovation quality[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2022, 145: 414-425. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.025
41 Jones C I. The past and future of economic growth: A semi-endogenous perspective[J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2022, 14(1): 125-152. DOI:10.1146/annurev-economics-080521-012458
42 Karhunen H, Huovari J. R&D subsidies and productivity in SMEs[J]. Small Business Economics, 2015, 45(4): 805-823. DOI:10.1007/s11187-015-9658-9
43 Kong D M, Lin C, Wei L, et al. Information accessibility and corporate innovation[J]. Management Science, 2022, 68(11): 7837-7860. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4224
44 Kwon S. How does patent transfer affect innovation of firms?[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 154: 119959. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119959
45 Lai S J, Yang L F, Wang Q, et al. Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2023, 80: 102424. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102424
46 Lanjouw J O, Schankerman M. Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators[J]. The Economic Journal, 2004, 114(495): 441-465. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
47 Lemley M A, Feldman R. Patent licensing, technology transfer, and innovation[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(5): 188-192. DOI:10.1257/aer.p20161092
48 Li H J, Zhang Y, Li Y. The impact of the digital economy on the total factor productivity of manufacturing firms: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 207: 123604. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123604
49 Li P, Lu Y, Wang J. Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2016, 123: 18-37. DOI:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2016.07.002
50 Liu W W, Tao Y, Bi K X. Capturing information on global knowledge flows from patent transfers: An empirical study using USPTO patents[J]. Research Policy, 2022, 51(5): 104509. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104509
51 Madsen J M, McMullin J L. Economic consequences of risk disclosures: Evidence from crowdfunding[J]. The Accounting Review, 2020, 95(4): 331-363. DOI:10.2308/accr-52641
52 Messinis G, Ahmed A D. Cognitive skills, innovation and technology diffusion[J]. Economic Modelling, 2013, 30: 565-578. DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.002
53 Montmartin B, Herrera M. Internal and external effects of R&D subsidies and fiscal incentives: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models[J]. Research Policy, 2015, 44(5): 1065-1079. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.013
54 Shen H J, Coreynen W, Huang C. Prestige and technology-transaction prices: Evidence from patent-selling by Chinese universities[J]. Technovation, 2023, 123: 102710. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102710
55 Shive S A, Forster M M. Corporate governance and pollution externalities of public and private firms[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2020, 33(3): 1296-1330. DOI:10.1093/rfs/hhz079
56 Wu X K, Yu J P. Does dialect difference impede patent transaction? Evidence from China's inter-city patent license data[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 187: 122197. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122197
57 Yu M Y, Hu M, Du H B, et al. Green manufacturing lists and firms’ green and low-carbon technological innovation: Evidence from China[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2026, 62(2): 624-636. DOI:10.1080/1540496X.2025.2540879
58 Zhao X, Liu G Q, Zhao X R. Tax incentives, financial subsidies and high-quality development of enterprises[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 86: 108350. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2025.108350