197 
116繁简分流改革是推进全面依法治国、促进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要举措。本文以民事诉讼程序繁简分流改革试点工作为准自然实验，考察繁简分流改革对企业创新的影响及其作用机制。研究发现，相较于非试点地区企业，改革实施后试点地区企业的专利申请数平均增加约13.72%。机制检验发现，上述影响主要通过成本节约效应、供应链依赖缓解效应、市场预期效应得以实现。异质性分析发现，该促进效应在数据资产化水平较高、商业信用水平较低以及所处行业竞争程度较高的企业中更强，繁简分流改革对企业创新的影响更强。进一步分析发现，繁简分流改革提高了企业突破性创新能力和创新效率。本文拓展了繁简分流改革经济后果的研究，从司法效能提升角度为推动创新驱动发展战略提供了经验证据和政策启示。
司法效能提升与企业创新——来自民事诉讼程序繁简分流改革的证据
摘要
参考文献
4 谷城, 张树山, 袁天荣, 等. 高铁开通对制造业企业高质量发展的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2025a, 22(12): 2201-2209.
5 谷城, 张树山, 张佩雯, 等. 数据赋能: 数据要素市场化配置与企业韧性塑造[J]. 中国软科学, 2025b, (12): 166-176.
6 何瑛, 陈丽丽, 杜亚光. 数据资产化能否缓解“专精特新”中小企业融资约束[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (8): 154-173. DOI:10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2024.08.008
7 胡诗阳, 尹亮, 祝继高. 破产法庭设立、债权人保护与地方性商业银行风险[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(12): 95-112.
12 黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4): 60-73.
13 刘贯春, 段玉柱, 刘媛媛. 经济政策不确定性、资产可逆性与固定资产投资[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(8): 53-70.
14 刘洪愧. 资本市场开放与企业预期改善[J]. 财贸经济, 2025, 46(2): 34-51. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-8102.2025.02.004
15 聂辉华, 阮睿, 沈吉. 企业不确定性感知、投资决策和金融资产配置[J]. 世界经济, 2020, 43(6): 77-98.
17 任曙明, 王梦娜. 科技金融政策能提升科技企业研发投入吗?——来自试点政策的经验证据[J]. 科学学研究, 2024, 42(5): 977-990,1052. DOI:10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.20230306.003
19 万海远, 张尉, 陈基平, 等. 税收政策支持与企业预期转变[J]. 经济研究, 2024, 59(4): 24-42.
21 王永钦, 董雯. 中国劳动力市场结构变迁——基于任务偏向型技术进步的视角[J]. 中国社会科学, 2023, (11): 45-64,205.
23 魏建, 薛启航, 王慧敏, 等. 银行监管处罚如何影响企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2024, (7): 105-123. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2024.07.011
24 邬爱其, 赵晶, 吴波, 等. 供应链集中与“专精特新”企业创新质量[J]. 经济管理, 2025, 47(4): 5-22.
27 杨金玉, 彭秋萍, 葛震霆. 数字化转型的客户传染效应——供应商创新视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022, (8): 156-174.
28 袁淳, 耿春晓, 从阓匀, 等. 地区司法水平与产业结构升级——来自巡回法庭设立的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(9): 171-189.
29 曾国安, 苏诗琴, 彭爽. 企业杠杆行为与技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023, (8): 155-173.
30 张杰, 郑文平, 翟福昕. 竞争如何影响创新: 中国情景的新检验[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014, (11): 56-68.
31 甄红线, 王玺, 方红星. 知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(11): 62-79.
32 Andersson U, Björkman I, Forsgren M. Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: The effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness[J]. International Business Review, 2005, 14(5): 521-538. DOI:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.001
33 Beladi H, Hou Q S, Hu M. The party school education and corporate innovation: Evidence from soes in China[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2022, 72: 102143. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102143
34 Brown J R, Petersen B C. Cash holdings and R&D smoothing[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2011, 17(3): 694-709. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.01.003
35 Campello M, Gao J. Customer concentration and loan contract terms[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2017, 123(1): 108-136. DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.03.010
36 Chen M, Tang X L, Liu H F, et al. The impact of supply chain concentration on integration and business performance[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, 257: 108781. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108781
37 De Bettignies J E, Liu H F, Robinson D T, et al. Competition and innovation in markets for technology[J]. Management Science, 2023, 69(8): 4753-4773. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4574
38 Hu G Q, Wang X Q, Wang Y. Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in china[J]. Energy Economics, 2021, 98: 105134. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105134
39 Huang X Q, Liu W, Zhang Z, et al. Intensive judicial oversight and corporate green innovations: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China[J]. China Economic Review, 2022, 74: 101799. DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2022.101799
40 Kamien M I, Schwartz N L. Self-financing of an R & D project[J]. The American Economic Review, 1978, 68(3): 252-261.
41 Kianto A, Sáenz J, Aramburu N. Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 81: 11-20. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.018
42 Lai S J, Yang L F, Wang Q, et al. Judicial independence and corporate innovation: Evidence from the establishment of circuit courts[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2023, 80: 102424. DOI:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102424
43 Li W, Peng Q. Digital courts and corporate investment in sustainability: Evidence from china[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2023, 88: 102682. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102682
44 Lin C L, Zhan S Y. Does the establishment of bankruptcy courts affect the risk of corporate collapse?[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, 96: 103792. DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103792
45 Liu B, Li Y F, Liu J P, et al. Does urban innovation policy accelerate the digital transformation of enterprises? Evidence based on the innovative city pilot policy[J]. China Economic Review, 2024, 85: 102167. DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102167
46 Martins H C. The Brazilian bankruptcy law reform, corporate ownership concentration, and risk-taking[J]. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2020, 41(4): 562-573. DOI:10.1002/mde.3120
47 Mehlig Sweet C, Eterovic Maggio D S. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation?[J]. World Development, 2015, 66: 665-677. DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.08.025
48 Peng Y Z, Tao C Q. Can digital transformation promote enterprise performance?-From the perspective of public policy and innovation[J]. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2022, 7(3): 100198.
49 Porter M E. Capital disadvantage: America’s failing capital investment system[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1992, 70(5): 65-82.
50 Shao S, Hu Z G, Cao J H, et al. Environmental regulation and enterprise innovation: A review[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(3): 1465-1478. DOI:10.1002/bse.2446
51 Shao Y M, Xu K L, Shan Y G. Leveraging corporate digitalization for green technology innovation: The mediating role of resource endowments[J]. Technovation, 2024, 133: 102999. DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102999
52 Subramaniam M, Youndt M A. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(3): 450-463. DOI:10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
53 Valeev D, Makolkin N. Digitization of civil legal proceedings in the russian federation[J]. Russian Law Journal, 2021, 9(4): 158-175. DOI:10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-4-158-175
54 Wang C F, Hu Q Y. Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance[J]. Technovation, 2020, 94-95: 102010.
55 Wang S H, Zhang X. Environmental courts, financing constraints, and corporate green innovation[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2025, 75: 106737. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2025.106737
56 Xue Y F, He S. Judicial reforms and corporate governance: The contribution of circuit courts to esg performance improvement[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2024, 66: 105683. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2024.105683
57 Yang H C, Li L S, Liu Y B. The effect of manufacturing intelligence on green innovation performance in china[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 178: 121569. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121569
58 Yang S B, Jahanger A, Hossain M R. How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from chinese industrial enterprises[J]. Energy Economics, 2023, 118: 106523. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106523
59 Zhang Y, Wu K. Bankruptcy court establishment and corporate risk-taking[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2023, 58: 104490. DOI:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104490
60 Zhuo C F, Chen J. Can digital transformation overcome the enterprise innovation dilemma: Effect, mechanism and effective boundary[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 190: 122378.
引用本文
谷城, 张树山, 张佩雯, 等. 司法效能提升与企业创新——来自民事诉讼程序繁简分流改革的证据[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(8): 113-132.
导出参考文献，格式为：
