创业团队异质性对创业绩效的影响研究综述

程江

doi:doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2017.10.001

/ 期刊集群 / 外国经济与管理

外国经济与管理

主编：李增泉

常务副主编：郑春荣

副主编：阴慧芳贺小刚刘建国

ISSN：1001-4950

刊号：31-1063/F

创刊于1979年，是面向国内外公开发行的管理类学术期刊。

期刊首页 > 全部期刊 > 2017 > 10期 > 论文详细信息

创业团队异质性对创业绩效的影响研究综述

程江

作者单位信息

HTML 全文 | PDF 全文(1029.9 KB)

8572

7971

外国经济与管理 2017 年第 39 卷第 10 期, 页码：3 - 17 DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2017.10.001

出版日期：2017年10月1日

摘要

参考文献

摘要

创业团队异质性是指团队成员在人口特征、教育背景、技能、经验、认知观念、价值观等方面的差异。随着团队创业成为主要创业形式，创业团队异质性对创业绩效的影响成为创业研究中的重要问题。在对创业团队异质性进行综述的基础上，本文将创业绩效分为融资、创新和成长性三个方面，围绕创业团队异质性对三者影响这一主题，对相关文献进行了梳理，分析了创业团队异质性影响创业绩效背后的理论逻辑。未来研究应进一步深化对创业团队异质性的理解，重视创业团队区别于高管团队的特性以及由此产生的影响。文章最后讨论了相关研究对创业实践的启示。

关键词

创业团队; 创业团队异质性; 创业绩效

1 杜海东. 创业团队经验异质性对进入战略创新的影响: 创业学习的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, （1）: 132–139.0

2 胡望斌, 张玉利, 杨俊. 同质性还是异质性: 创业导向对技术创业团队与新企业绩效关系的调节作用研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014, （6）: 92–109, 187–188.0

3 黄昱方, 秦明青. 创业团队异质性研究综述[J]. 科技管理研究, 2010, （16）: 142–145.0 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2010.16.037

4 李江一, 李涵. 住房对家庭创业的影响: 来自CHFS的证据[J]. 中国经济问题, 2016, （2）: 53–67.0

5 李雪莲, 马双, 邓翔. 公务员家庭、创业与寻租动机[J]. 经济研究, 2015, （5）: 89–103.0

6 刘刚, 李超, 吴彦俊. 创业团队异质性与新企业绩效关系的路径: 基于动态能力的视角[J]. 系统管理学报, 2017a, （4）: 655–662.0

7 刘刚, 王丹, 李佳. 高管团队异质性、商业模式创新与企业绩效[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2017b, （4）: 105–114.0

8 刘刚, 王泽宇. 创业团队文化多样性与互联网创业融资——基于产品众筹数据的实证分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2016, （6）: 113–128.0

9 刘松博, 董修荃, 杜晓琳. 不同类型团队的异质性研究比较与评价[J]. 软科学, 2010, （10）: 18–22.0 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-8409.2010.10.005

10 刘志荣, 姜长云. 关于农民创业发展的文献综述——以西部地区农民创业为重点[J]. 经济研究参考, 2008, （66）: 37–47.0

11 倪旭东, 项小霞, 姚春序. 团队异质性的平衡性对团队创造力的影响[J]. 心理学报, 2016, （5）: 556–565.0

12 牛芳, 张玉利, 杨俊. 创业团队异质性与新企业绩效: 领导者乐观心理的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2011, （11）: 110–119.0

13 石书德, 张帏, 高建. 新企业创业团队的治理机制与团队绩效的关系[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, （5）: 14–27.0

14 石书德, 张帏, 高建. 影响新创企业绩效的创业团队因素研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011, （4）: 44–51.0

15 王飞绒, 陈劲, 池仁勇. 团队创业研究述评[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2006, （7）: 16–22.0

16 吴岩. 创业团队的知识异质性对创业绩效的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, （7）: 84–90.0

17 徐志坚, 魏娟, 夏伟. 高层管理团队异质性对创业企业首次公开募股折价的影响[J]. 南京大学学报（哲学·人文科学·社会科学版）, 2013, （4）: 36–44, 158.0

18 杨俊, 田莉, 张玉利等. 创新还是模仿: 创业团队经验异质性与冲突特征的角色[J]. 管理世界, 2010, （3）: 84–96.0

19 杨俊, 薛红志, 牛芳. 先前工作经验、创业机会与新技术企业绩效——一个交互效应模型及启示[J]. 管理学报, 2011, （1）: 116–125.0

20 张帏, 陈琳纯. 创业者的人力资本和社会资本对创业过程的影响[J]. 技术经济, 2009, （8）: 22–27.0

21 张秀娥, 孙中博, 韦韬. 创业团队异质性如何影响绩效: 基于团队氛围中介效应的分析[J]. 武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）, 2014, （3）: 106–111.0

22 张玉利, 龙丹, 杨俊. CPSED概述及其学术价值探讨[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2011, （1）: 11–18.0

23 赵文红, 薛朝阳. 创业团队异质性、认知合法性与资源获取关系研究[J]. 管理学报, 2017, （4）: 537–544.0

24 周劲波, 龙懂, 古翠凤. 影响创业融资因素的实证分析[J]. 工业技术经济, 2006, （11）: 154–157.0 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2006.11.045

25 周京奎, 黄征学. 住房制度改革、流动性约束与" 下海”创业选择——理论与中国的经验研究[J]. 经济研究, 2014, （3）: 158–170.0

26 朱国军, 吴价宝, 董诗笑, 等. 高管团队人口特征、激励与创新绩效的关系研究——来自中国创业板上市公司的实证研究[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2013, （6）: 143–150.0

27 朱仁宏, 曾楚宏, 代吉林. 创业团队研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2012, （11）: 11–18.0

28 朱仁宏, 代吉林, 曾楚宏. 创业团队演化与治理研究: 基于人力资本理论的解释[J]. 学术研究, 2013, （10）: 81–86, 100, 159.0 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7326.2013.10.013

29 Amason A C, Shrader R C, Tompson G H. Newness and novelty: Relating top management team composition to new venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21（1）: 125–148. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.008

30 Baum J A C, Silverman B S. Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2004, 19（3）: 411–436. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00038-7

31 Beckman C M, Burton M D, O’reilly C. Early teams: The impact of team demography on VC financing and going public[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007, 22（2）: 147–173. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.02.001

32 Beckman C M. The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49（4）: 741–758. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083030

33 Bouncken R B. Cultural diversity in entrepreneurial teams: Findings of new ventures in Germany[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2004, 13（4）: 240–253. DOI:10.1111/caim.2004.13.issue-4

34 Certo S T, Holcomb T R, Holmes Jr R M. IPO research in management and entrepreneurship: Moving the agenda forward[J]. Journal of Management, 2009, 35（6）: 1340–1378. DOI:10.1177/0149206309347375

35 Chaganti R R S, Watts A D, Chaganti R, et al. Ethnic-immigrants in founding teams: Effects on prospector strategy and performance in new internet ventures[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2008, 23（1）: 113–139. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.07.004

36 Colombo M G, Grilli L. Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view[J]. Research Policy, 2005, 34（6）: 795–816. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.010

37 Connelly B L, Certo S, Ireland R et al. Signaling theory: A review and assessment[J]. Journal of Management, 2011, 37（1）: 39–67. DOI:10.1177/0149206310388419

38 Delarue A, Van Hootegem G, Procter S, et al. Teamworking and organizational performance: A review of survey-based research[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2008, 10（2）: 127–148. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00227.x

39 Drach-Zahavy A, Somech A. Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures[J]. Group Dynamics Theory Research, and Practice, 2001, 5（2）: 111–123. DOI:10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.111

40 Eisenhardt K M. Top management teams and the performance of entrepreneurial firms[J]. Small Business Economics, 2013, 40（4）: 805–816. DOI:10.1007/s11187-013-9473-0

41 Elsbach K D, Kramer R M. Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: Evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46（3）: 283–301. DOI:10.2307/30040623

42 Ensley M D, Pearson A W, Amason A C. Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2002, 17（4）: 365–386. DOI:10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00065-3

43 Harrison D A, Klein K J. What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32（4）: 1199–1228. DOI:10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096

44 Harrison D A, Price K H, Gavin J H, et al. Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface-and deep-level diversity on group functioning[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45（5）: 1029–1045. DOI:10.2307/3069328

45 Henneke D, Lüthje C. Interdisciplinary heterogeneity as a catalyst for product innovativeness of entrepreneurial teams[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2007, 16（2）: 121–132. DOI:10.1111/caim.2007.16.issue-2

46 Hmieleski K M, Ensley M D. A contextual examination of new venture performance: Entrepreneur leadership behavior, top management team heterogeneity, and environmental dynamism[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2007, 28（7）: 865–889. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379

47 Homberg F, Bui H T. Top management team diversity: A systematic review[J]. Group & Organization Management, 2013, 38（4）: 455–479.

48 Horwitz S K, Horwitz I B. The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography[J]. Journal of Management, 2007, 33（6）: 987–1015. DOI:10.1177/0149206307308587

49 Jackson S E, Joshi A, Erhardt N L. Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications[J]. Journal of Management, 2003, 29（6）: 801–830. DOI:10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00080-1

50 Jeffcutt P, Pratt A C. Managing creativity in the cultural industries[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2002, 11（4）: 225–233. DOI:10.1111/caim.2002.11.issue-4

51 Jehn K A, Northcraft G B, Neale M A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44（4）: 741–763. DOI:10.2307/2667054

52 Joshi A, Roh H. The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52（3）: 599–627. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491

53 Kearney E, Gebert D, Voelpel S C. When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2009, 52（3）: 581–598. DOI:10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331431

54 Kristinsson K, Candi M, Sæmundsson R J. The relationship between founder team diversity and innovation performance: The moderating role of causation logic[J]. Long Range Planning, 2015, 49（4）: 464–476.

55 Lester R H, Certo S T, Dalton C M, et al. Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2006, 44（1）: 1–26. DOI:10.1111/jsbm.2006.44.issue-1

56 Lopez-Cabrales A, Pérez-Luño A, Cabrera R V. Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity[J]. Human Resource Management, 2009, 48（4）: 485–503. DOI:10.1002/hrm.v48:4

57 Ma H, Tan J. Key components and implications of entrepreneurship: A 4-p framework[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21（5）: 704–725. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.04.009

58 Maschke K, Knyphausen-Aufseβ D Z. How the entrepreneurial top management team setup influences firm performance and the ability to raise capital: A literature review[J]. Business Research, 2012, 5（1）: 83–123. DOI:10.1007/BF03342733

59 Mazra M. Entrepreneurial team diversity and new venture performance in Cameroon: The moderating effect of conflicts[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2017, 21（4）: 1750038. DOI:10.1142/S1363919617500384

60 Milliken F J, Martins L L. Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21（2）: 402–433.

61 Mollick E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014, 29（1）: 1–16. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005

62 Nielsen S. Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2010, 12（3）: 301–316.

63 Patzelt H, Knyphausen-Aufseß D Z, Nikol P. Top management teams, business models, and performance of biotechnology ventures: An upper echelon perspective[J]. British Journal of Management, 2008, 19（3）: 205–221. DOI:10.1111/bjom.2008.19.issue-3

64 Pelled L H, Eisenhardt K M, Xin K R. Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44（1）: 1–28. DOI:10.2307/2667029

65 Richard O C, Barnett T, Dwyer S, et al. Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47（2）: 255–266. DOI:10.2307/20159576

66 Schjoedt L, Kraus S. Entrepreneurial teams: definition and performance factors[J]. Management Research News, 2009, 32（6）: 513–524. DOI:10.1108/01409170910962957

67 Schjoedt L, Monsen E, Pearson A, et al. New venture and family business teams: Understanding team formation, composition, behaviors, and performance[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2013, 37（1）: 1–15. DOI:10.1111/etap.2013.37.issue-1

68 Shin S J, Kim T Y, Lee J Y, et al. Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55（1）: 197–212. DOI:10.5465/amj.2010.0270

69 Srikanth K, Harvey S, Peterson R. A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2016, 10（1）: 453–493. DOI:10.1080/19416520.2016.1120973

70 Stam W, Arzlanian S, Elfring T. Social capital of entrepreneurs and small firm performance: A meta-analysis of contextual and methodological moderators[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014, 29（1）: 152–173. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.01.002

71 Ughetto E. Growth of born globals: The role of the entrepreneur’s personal factors and venture capital[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2016, 12（3）: 839–857. DOI:10.1007/s11365-015-0368-1

72 Van Knippenberg D, De Dreu C K, Homan A C. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2004, 89（6）: 1008–1022. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008

73 Van Knippenberg D, Van Ginkel W P, Homan A C. Diversity mindsets and the performance of diverse teams[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2013, 121（2）: 183–193. DOI:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.03.003

74 Vissa B, Chacar A S. Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30（11）: 1179–1191. DOI:10.1002/smj.v30:11

75 Vogel R, Puhan T X, Shehu E, et al. Funding decisions and entrepreneurial team diversity: A field study[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2014, 107: 595–613.

76 Williams M. Being trusted: How team generational age diversity promotes and undermines trust in cross-boundary relationships[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2016, 37（3）: 346–373. DOI:10.1002/job.v37.3

77 Zhou W C, Rosini E. Entrepreneurial team diversity and performance: Toward an integrated model[J]. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2015, 5（1）: 31–60.

78 Zimmerman M A, Zeitz G J. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27（3）: 414–431.

79 Zimmerman M A. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on the capital raised through an initial public offering[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2008, 32（3）: 391–414. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00233.x

引用本文

程江. 创业团队异质性对创业绩效的影响研究综述[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(10): 3–17.

导出参考文献，格式为：

上一篇：技术创新、气候变化与经济增长理论的扩展及其应用——2018 年度诺贝尔经济学奖得主主要经济理论贡献述评

下一篇：懒惰的消费者如何决策？——基于线索效用理论的消费者认知吝啬研究综述及营销启示

本期封面

2017年第10期