Lai Youxuan. Delivery riders, stuck in the system[EB/OL]. https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/225120404, 2020-09-09.
 Alder G S, Ambrose M L. An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2005, 97(2): 161-177.
 Aquino K, Lewis M U, Bradfield M. Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,1999, 20(7): 1073-1091.
 Bradley G W. Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1978, 36(1): 56-71.
 Burton J W, Stein M K, Jensen T B. A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2020, 33(2): 220-239.
 Claggett J L, Karahanna E. Unpacking the structure of coordination mechanisms and the role of relational coordination in an era of digitally mediated work processes[J]. Academy of Management Review,2018, 43(4): 704-722.
 Colquitt J A, Conlon D E, Wesson M J, et al. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2001, 86(3): 425-445.
 Colquitt J A, Scott B A, Rodell J B, et al. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2013, 98(2): 199-236.
 Dietvorst B J, Simmons J P, Massey C. Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2015, 144(1): 114-126.
 Dietvorst B J, Simmons J P, Massey C. Overcoming algorithm aversion: People will use imperfect algorithms if they can(even slightly)modify them[J]. Management Science,2018, 64(3): 1155-1170.
 Gioia D A, Corley K G, Hamilton A L. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology[J]. Organizational Research Methods,2013, 16(1): 15-31.
 Hay C, Meldrum R, Mann K. Traditional bullying, cyber bullying, and deviance: A general strain theory approach[J]. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice,2010, 26(2): 130-147.
 Hayes A F. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2017.
 Hoobler J M, Brass D J. Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2006, 91(5): 1125-1133.
 Jones D A, Martens M L. The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice–criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2009, 30(8): 1025-1051.
 Kelley H H, Michela J L. Attribution theory and research[J]. Annual Review of Psychology,1980, 31: 457-501.
 Kellogg K C, Valentine M A, Christin A. Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2020, 14(1): 366-410.
 Kizilcec R F. How much information?: Effects of transparency on trust in an algorithmic interface[A]. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems[C]. San Jose: ACM, 2016.
 Konovsky M A, Folger R. The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims’ layoff reactions[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,1991, 21(8): 630-650.
 Langer M, König C J, Sanchez D R P, et al. Highly automated interviews: Applicant reactions and the organizational context[J]. Journal of Managerial Psychology,2020, 35(4): 301-314.
 Lee M K. Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management[J]. Big Data & Society,2018, 5(1): 1-16.
 Lee M K, Kusbit D, Metsky E, et al. Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers[A]. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems[C]. Seoul: ACM, 2015.
 Leventhal G S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships[A]. Gergen K J, Greenberg M S, Willis R H. Social exchange: Advances in theory and research[M]. New York: Plenum, 1980.
 Lind E A. Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations[A]. Greenberg J, Cropanzano R. Advances in organization justice[M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.
 Logg J M, Minson J A, Moore D A. Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2019, 151: 90-103.
 Marcus-Newhall A, Pedersen W C, Carlson M, et al. Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2000, 78(4): 670-689.
 McNall L A, Roch S G. Effects of electronic monitoring types on perceptions of procedural justice, interpersonal justice, and privacy[J]. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,2007, 37(3): 658-682.
 Newman D T, Fast N J, Harmon D J. When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2020, 160: 149-167.
 Ötting S K, Maier G W. The importance of procedural justice in human–machine interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2018, 89: 27-39.
 Schlicker N, Langer M, Ötting S K, et al. What to expect from opening up “black boxes”? Comparing perceptions of justice between human and automated agents[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2021, 122: 106837.
 Shin D, Park Y J. Role of fairness, accountability, and transparency in algorithmic affordance[J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2019, 98: 277-284.
 Sundar S S, Nass C. Conceptualizing sources in online news[J]. Journal of Communication,2001, 51(1): 52-72.
 Wolosin R J, Sherman S J, Till A. Effects of cooperation and competition on responsibility attribution after success and failure[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,1973, 9(3): 220-235.