我国央行财产豁免制度的完善:以利益平衡为视角
6528 
87
上海财经大学学报 2014 年 第 16 卷第 02 期, 页码：90 - 97
摘要
参考文献
摘要
为维护纽约国际金融中心地位和美元的国际储备货币地位,美国在区分管辖豁免和执行豁免的立法基础上,通过立法与司法、司法与行政等层面的结构性设计来实现投资者与外国央行之间的利益平衡。实践中,美国法院通过对"央行财产"、"放弃豁免"等立法条文的解读进一步维护了此种利益平衡之实现。在面临建设国际金融中心、维护境外外汇投资安全和应对主权债务危机等多重政策诉求的背景下,我国可以考虑利用管辖权与判决执行两阶段的互动,在管辖权豁免、央行财产界定、放弃豁免和对等原则等方面来满足我国对央行财产豁免制度的政策需求。
①See 1973DIG.Of U.S.PRAC.OF INT'L L.227,228-29,1974.
②Ernest T Patrikis,Foreign Central Bank Property:Immunity from Attachment in the United States,U Ill L Rev,1982,p.
①See Weilamann v.Chase Manhattan Bank,21Misc.2d1086,192N.Y.S.2d469(Sup.Ct.1959).
②H.R.Rep.No.94-1487,1976,at 7.
③Brock,Carolyn J,the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act:Defining a Role for the Executive,Virginia Journal of International Law,Vol.30,1990,p.795.
④FA Mann,the State Immunity Act 1978,BYIL,Vol.50,1979,p.61.
①NML Capital,Ltd.v.Banco Central de la República Argentina,No.10-1487-cv(L),—F.3d—,2011 WL 2611269,at19-20(2dCir.July 5,2011).
②Paul L.Lee,Central Banks and Sovereign Immunity,Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,Vol.41,2002,p.377.
③See Olympic Chartering,S.A.v.Ministry of Indus.&Trade of Jordan,134F.Supp.2d528,534(S.D.N.Y.2001).
①See NML Capital,Ltd.v.Banco Central de la República Argentina.,652F.3d,at 194.
②Weston Compaigne de Finance et d’Investissement,S.A.v.La Republic del Ecuador,823FSupp 1106(SDNY 1993),at 1113.
③See Ministry of Def.&Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v.Cubic Def.Sys.,Inc.,385F.3d1206,1223(9th Cir.2004).
④NML Capital,Ltd.v.Banco Central de la Republica Argentina,C.A.2(N.Y.)2011,652F.3d,at 172.
⑤Weston Compaigne de Finance et d’Investissement,S.A.v.La Republic del Ecuador,823F.Supp.1106(SDNY 1993),at 1111.
①Eaglet Corp.v.Banco Central de Nicaragua,839F.Supp.232(S.D.N.Y.1993).
②NML Capital,Ltd.v.Republic of Argentina(No.11-4065-cv(L)).
③Banco Central de Reserva del Peru v.Riggs Nat.Bank of Washington,D.C.919F.Supp.13D.D.C.,1994.
②Ernest T Patrikis,Foreign Central Bank Property:Immunity from Attachment in the United States,U Ill L Rev,1982,p.
①See Weilamann v.Chase Manhattan Bank,21Misc.2d1086,192N.Y.S.2d469(Sup.Ct.1959).
②H.R.Rep.No.94-1487,1976,at 7.
③Brock,Carolyn J,the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act:Defining a Role for the Executive,Virginia Journal of International Law,Vol.30,1990,p.795.
④FA Mann,the State Immunity Act 1978,BYIL,Vol.50,1979,p.61.
①NML Capital,Ltd.v.Banco Central de la República Argentina,No.10-1487-cv(L),—F.3d—,2011 WL 2611269,at19-20(2dCir.July 5,2011).
②Paul L.Lee,Central Banks and Sovereign Immunity,Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,Vol.41,2002,p.377.
③See Olympic Chartering,S.A.v.Ministry of Indus.&Trade of Jordan,134F.Supp.2d528,534(S.D.N.Y.2001).
①See NML Capital,Ltd.v.Banco Central de la República Argentina.,652F.3d,at 194.
②Weston Compaigne de Finance et d’Investissement,S.A.v.La Republic del Ecuador,823FSupp 1106(SDNY 1993),at 1113.
③See Ministry of Def.&Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v.Cubic Def.Sys.,Inc.,385F.3d1206,1223(9th Cir.2004).
④NML Capital,Ltd.v.Banco Central de la Republica Argentina,C.A.2(N.Y.)2011,652F.3d,at 172.
⑤Weston Compaigne de Finance et d’Investissement,S.A.v.La Republic del Ecuador,823F.Supp.1106(SDNY 1993),at 1111.
①Eaglet Corp.v.Banco Central de Nicaragua,839F.Supp.232(S.D.N.Y.1993).
②NML Capital,Ltd.v.Republic of Argentina(No.11-4065-cv(L)).
③Banco Central de Reserva del Peru v.Riggs Nat.Bank of Washington,D.C.919F.Supp.13D.D.C.,1994.
引用本文
郭华春. 我国央行财产豁免制度的完善:以利益平衡为视角[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2014, 16(2): 90–97.
导出参考文献，格式为：
上一篇：绿色金融•主持人语：赵晓菊
下一篇：论民间借贷利率上限的确定
