6964 
8002网络关系特征是影响产品创新绩效的重要变量，对集群内企业产品创新有至关重要的影响。本文从网络视角出发，研究产业集群内网络关系强度、关系质量对产品创新绩效的影响，并从环境动态性和环境复杂性两个维度来研究企业所面临的环境不确定性对上述关系的调节效应。利用南京软件谷210家软件企业的调查数据，对所提的假设进行一一验证。研究发现：网络关系强度、关系质量均对产品创新绩效具有显著的正向影响，环境动态性对集群网络关系强度与产品创新绩效的关系起到负向调节作用，环境复杂性对集群网络关系质量与产品创新绩效的关系起到负向调节作用。本文通过引入环境不确定性这一调节变量，突破以往对网络关系特征与产品创新绩效的直接关系研究，对提升企业产品创新绩效以及引导区域创新政策的制定等具有重要的现实意义。
产业集群网络关系特征对产品创新绩效的影响——环境不确定性的调节效应
摘要
参考文献
4 Bagozzi R P, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models[J]. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 1988, 16（1）: 74–94. DOI:10.1007/BF02723327
5 Baker W E, Sinkula J M. The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance[J]. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 1999, 27（4）: 411–427. DOI:10.1177/0092070399274002
6 Calantone R, Garcia R, Dröge C. The effects of environmental turbulence on new product development strategy planning[J]. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2003, 20（2）: 90–103. DOI:10.1111/1540-5885.2002003
7 Capaldo A. Network structure and innovation: The leveraging of a dual network as a distinctive relational capability[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28（6）: 585–608. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
8 Chi L, Ravichandran T, Andrevski G. Information technology, network structure, and competitive action[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21（3）: 543–570. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0296
9 Churchill G A Jr. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, 16（1）: 64–73. DOI:10.2307/3150876
10 Dayan M, Basarir A. Antecedents and consequences of team reflexivity in new product development projects[J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2010, 25（1）: 18–29.
11 Dess G G, Beard D W. Dimensions of organizational task environments[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1984, 29（1）: 52–73. DOI:10.2307/2393080
12 Fornell C, Larcker D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981, 18: 39–50. DOI:10.2307/3151312
13 Fu T, Zhang Y A. Simulation of technological innovation network diffusion in focal firm cored industrial clusters[J]. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 2012, 15（4）: 310–319. DOI:10.1504/IJMIC.2012.046411
14 Garcia R, Calantone R. A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review[J]. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2002, 19（2）: 110–132. DOI:10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00132-1
15 Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91（3）: 481–510. DOI:10.1086/228311
16 Gulati R, Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1990, 104（5）: 1439–1493.
17 Jansen J J P, Volberda H W, Van Den Bosch F A J. Exploratory innovation, Exploitative innovation and ambidexterity: The impact of environmental and organizational Antecedents[J]. Schmalenbach Business Review, 2005, 57: 351–363.
18 Jauch L R, Osborn R N, Glueck W F. Short term financial success in large business organizations: The environment-strategy connection[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1980, 1（1）: 49–63. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
19 Kale P, Singh H, Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21（3）: 217–237. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
20 Kaufman A, Wood C H, Theyel G. Collaboration and technology linkages: A strategic supplier Typology[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21（6）: 649–663. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
21 Keats B W, Hitt M A. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance[J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 31（3）: 570–598. DOI:10.2307/256460
22 McEvily B, Zabeer A. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20（12）: 1133–1156. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
23 Miller D, Friesen P H. Strategy-making and environment: The third link[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1983, 4（3）: 221–235. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
24 Ritter T, Gemünden H G. The impact of a company’s business strategy on its technological competence, network competence and innovation success[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2004, 75（5）: 548–556.
25 Tichy N M, Tushman M L, Fombrun C. Social network analysis for organizations[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4（4）: 507–519.
26 Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect[J]. American Sociological Review, 1996, 61（4）: 674–698. DOI:10.2307/2096399
27 Walter A, Müller T A, Helfert G, et al. Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32（2）: 159–169. DOI:10.1016/S0019-8501(02)00230-4
28 Weerawardena J, O’Cass A. Exploring the characteristics of the market-driven firms and antecedents to sustained competitive advantage[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004, 33（5）: 419–428. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.07.002
29 Yang C, Liu H M. Boosting firm performance via enterprise agility and network structure[J]. Management Decision, 2012, 50（6）: 1022–1044. DOI:10.1108/00251741211238319
30 Zaheer A, Bell G G. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes and performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26（9）: 809–825. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
引用本文
吴松强, 苏思骐, 沈忠芹, 等. 产业集群网络关系特征对产品创新绩效的影响——环境不确定性的调节效应[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2017, 39(5): 46–57.
导出参考文献，格式为：
