227 
145不同资源间的协同有助于放大资源价值，是企业实现持续成长和构建竞争优势的重要基础。现有资源协同研究已形成一系列成果，但仍存在研究视角分散、动态演化关注不足和数字情境阐释不充分等问题。本文通过系统梳理相关文献发现，系统理论、资源基础理论、权变理论和动态能力理论构成了资源协同研究的重要理论基础。在此基础上，本文构建了组织资源协同的形成、变革与价值实现机制框架，指出资源协同经历“协同基础—协同机制—协同效应”的形成过程，并通过企业能力提升和企业行为优化转化为企业价值、企业绩效及其他组织结果，同时受到宏观地区环境、中观行业环境和微观企业情境的共同影响。本文进一步将协同变革纳入资源协同过程框架，强调企业需要根据环境变化、战略调整和绩效反馈推动资源协同持续重构。最后，本文比较了传统资源协同与数字资源协同的差异，揭示了数字情境下连接压力、反馈压力、扩展压力和适应压力如何推动资源协同逻辑发生系统性演化。本研究突破了既有资源协同研究相对分散和静态的分析局限，构建了系统化的资源协同研究框架，揭示了资源协同在数字情境下的动态演化逻辑，从而推动了资源协同研究的系统化、动态化与数字情境化拓展。
组织资源协同研究：理论溯源、整合框架与数字化演进
摘要
参考文献
1 蔡跃洲, 林靖玲, 陈楠. 数据并购视角的数据资源潜在价值与价值实现[J]. 中国工业经济, 2025, (12): 80-99. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-480X.2025.12.005
2 郭韬, 黄建行. 数字领导力对企业商业模式创新的影响机制研究——基于动态能力与权变理论视角[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2026, 43(4): 98-108. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.D32025010414
3 焦豪, 杨季枫, 应瑛. 动态能力研究述评及开展中国情境化研究的建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 191-210, 14. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2021.05.015
4 李真, 李馨怡. 企业数字化战略更新与动态能力构建——基于徐家汇商城股份的纵向案例研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(7): 101-119. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250103.401
5 刘和东, 陈文潇. 资源互补与行为协同提升合作绩效的黑箱解构——以高新技术企业为对象的实证分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(10): 1847-1857. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2020.10.013
6 刘珍园, 胡海晨. 平台生态嵌入企业数字创新路径研究——基于复杂适应系统理论的组态分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2026, 43(11): 101-111. DOI:10.6049/kjjbydc.D62025040963
7 马鸿佳, 王亚婧, 苏中锋. 数字化转型背景下中小制造企业如何编排资源利用数字机会——基于资源编排理论的fsQCA研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2024, 27(4): 90-100, 208. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2024.04.009
8 彭正银, 张晨, 李妍. 中小制造企业如何走向平台化——基于数据资源编排视角的探索性案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2025, 28(7): 54-65. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2025.07.006
9 单标安, 刘克难, 徐雨乔, 等. ESG表现对智能制造企业成长的影响——基于一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(7): 70-84. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20241213.101
10 单标安, 刘晓菊, 赵润萱, 等. 组织能力、组织创新与数字化转型如何激发新产品开发绩效?——基于fsQCA的组态效应研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2022, 34(3): 81-93. DOI:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211523
11 苏敬勤, 国玉琳. 新创科技企业如何构建价值场景: 基于“机会—资源一体化”视角[J/OL]. 南开管理评论, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/12.1288.F.20251014.1400.002, 2026-04-15.
12 苏敬勤, 孙悦, 高昕. 连续数字化转型背景下的数字化能力演化机理——基于资源编排视角[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(10): 1853-1863. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2053.2022.10.013
13 孙青, 马鸿佳, 王春蕾. 数字平台能力实证研究现状评析与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(10): 98-115. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250613.401
14 孙新波, 张媛, 王永霞, 等. 数字价值创造: 研究框架与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2021, 43(10): 35-49. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20210322.401
15 孙永磊, 刘心雨, 宋晶, 等. 数字化赋能企业新质生产力的机制研究[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(4): 135-152. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250723.402
16 汤桐, 马春爱. 数据资源-传统资源匹配对转型升级的影响机制——技术创新的中介效应[J]. 软科学, 2024, 38(11): 34-40. DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2024.11.05
17 汪秀婷, 程斌武. 资源整合、协同创新与企业动态能力的耦合机理[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(4): 44-50. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2014.04.006
18 魏江, 王丁, 刘洋. 来源国劣势与合法化战略——新兴经济企业跨国并购的案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(3): 101-119. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2020.03.008
19 杨贵彬, 侯雁, 鲁效平, 等. 从“星星之火”到“燎原之势”: 跨界创新情境下工业互联网平台价值共创演化研究[J/OL]. 研究与发展管理, https://doi.org/10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20241640, 2026-04-15.
20 杨鹏, 尹志锋, 孙宝文. 企业数字技术应用与创新效率提升[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2024, 46(11): 51-67. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20231129.401
21 易加斌, 张梓仪, 杨小平, 等. 互联网企业组织惯性、数字化能力与商业模式创新[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(5): 29-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2022.05.004
22 弋亚群, 刘益, 李垣. 组织资源的协同机制及其效应分析[J]. 经济管理, 2003, (16): 12-16. DOI:10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2003.16.002
23 余传鹏, 黎展锋, 林春培, 等. 数字创新网络嵌入对制造企业新产品开发绩效的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2024, 40(5): 154-173. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2024.05.010
24 张璐, 王岩, 苏敬勤, 等. 资源基础理论: 发展脉络、知识框架与展望[J]. 南开管理评论, 2023, 26(4): 246-256. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2023.04.024
25 张竹, 邢小强, 徐赫辰. 人工智能技术创新与中国企业高质量发展: 能力基础观视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(9): 86-105. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20250228.401
26 周全, 程梦婷, 吴绍波, 等. 新能源汽车企业创新生态系统协同构建研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 32-41. DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.004
27 朱秀梅, 林晓玥, 王天东, 等. 数据价值化: 研究评述与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2023, 45(12): 3-17. DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20230719.401
28 Ackoff R L. Towards a system of systems concepts[J]. Management Science, 1971, 17(11): 661-671. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.17.11.661
29 Adner R, Helfat C E. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10): 1011-1025. DOI:10.1002/smj.331
30 Aral S, Weill P. IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(5): 763-780. DOI:10.1287/orsc.1070.0306
31 Autio E, Nambisan S, Thomas L D W, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(1): 72-95. DOI:10.1002/sej.1266
32 Bai J K, Zha Y, Zhang H X, et al. Relating digital platform synergy and SME agility: The roles of organizational inertia and modularity[J]. Information & Management, 2026, 63(2): 104279. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2025.104279
33 Baker T, Nelson R E. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005, 50(3): 329-366. DOI:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
34 Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120. DOI:10.1177/014920639101700108
35 Barney J, Wright M, Ketchen D J. The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991[J]. Journal of Management, 2001, 27(6): 625-641. DOI:10.1177/014920630102700601
36 Bingham C B, Heimeriks K H, Schijven M, et al. Concurrent learning: How firms develop multiple dynamic capabilities in parallel[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2015, 36(12): 1802-1825. DOI:10.1002/smj.2347
37 Cao G M, Duan Y Q, Cadden T, et al. Systemic capabilities: The source of IT business value[J]. Information Technology & People, 2016, 29(3): 556-579. DOI:10.1108/ITP-05-2014-0090
38 Cao G M, Wiengarten F, Humphreys P. Towards a contingency resource-based view of IT business value[J]. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2011, 24(1): 85-106. DOI:10.1007/s11213-010-9178-0
39 Chen J L. The synergistic effects of IT-enabled resources on organizational capabilities and firm performance[J]. Information & Management, 2012, 49(3-4): 142-150. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2012.01.005
40 Corning P A. Synergy and self-organization in the evolution of complex systems[J]. Systems Research, 1995, 12(2): 89-121. DOI:10.1002/sres.3850120204
41 Corning P A. “The synergism hypothesis”: On the concept of synergy and its role in the evolution of complex systems[J]. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 1998, 21(2): 133-172. DOI:10.1016/S1061-7361(00)80003-X
42 Daft R L, Weick K E. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 284-295. DOI:10.2307/258441
43 DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields[J]. American Sociological Review, 1983, 48(2): 147-160. DOI:10.2307/2095101
44 Donaldson L. The contingency theory of organizations[M]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2001.
45 Dong J Q, McCarthy K J, Schoenmakers W W M E. How central is too central? Organizing interorganizational collaboration networks for breakthrough innovation[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2017, 34(4): 526-542. DOI:10.1111/jpim.12384
46 Dong J Q, Yang C H. Business value of big data analytics: A systems-theoretic approach and empirical test[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(1): 103124. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2018.11.001
47 Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1105-1121. DOI:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
48 Ferratt T W, Prasad J, Enns H G. Synergy and its limits in managing information technology professionals[J]. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(4): 1175-1194. DOI:10.1287/isre.1110.0413
49 Fiedler F E. A contingency model of leadership effectiveness[J]. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1964, 1: 149-190. DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_300397
50 Fredericks E. Infusing flexibility into business-to-business firms: A contingency theory and resource-based view perspective and practical implications[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2005, 34(6): 555-565. DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.09.022
51 George J J, Yan J, Leidner D E. Data philanthropy: Corporate responsibility with strategic value?[J]. Information Systems Management, 2020, 37(3): 186-197. DOI:10.1080/10580530.2020.1696587
52 Glazer R, Weiss A M. Marketing in turbulent environments: Decision processes and the time-sensitivity of information[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1993, 30(4): 509-521. DOI:10.1177/002224379303000409
53 Gruca T S, Nath D, Mehra A. Exploiting synergy for competitive advantage[J]. Long Range Planning, 1997, 30(4): 481-482, 605-611. DOI:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)00039-3
54 Hagedoorn J. Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2006, 31(3): 670-680. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.21318924
55 Haken H. Synergetics[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
56 Haken H. Advanced synergetics[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1983.
57 Hervas-Oliver J L, Albors-Garrigos J. The role of the firm’s internal and relational capabilities in clusters: When distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2009, 9(2): 263-283. DOI:10.1093/jeg/lbn033
58 Horgan J, Mühlau P. Human resource systems and employee performance in Ireland and the Netherlands: A test of the complementarity hypothesis[J]. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006, 17(3): 414-439. DOI:10.1080/09585190500521409
59 Kast F E, Rosenzweig J E. General systems theory: Applications for organization and management[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1972, 15(4): 447-465. DOI:10.2307/255141
60 Koster F. HR innovation through inter-organizational HR collaboration[J]. Innovation & Management Review, 2024, 21(2): 123-136. DOI:10.1108/INMR-12-2021-0232
61 Lumor T, Pulkkinen M, Chan Y E, et al. Exploring the renewal of IT-enabled resources from a structural perspective[J]. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2023, 53: 555-590. DOI:10.17705/1CAIS.05324
62 Luo X M, Griffith D A, Liu S S, et al. The effects of customer relationships and social capital on firm performance: A Chinese business illustration[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2004, 12(4): 25-45. DOI:10.1509/jimk.12.4.25.53216
63 Melancon J P, Griffith D A, Noble S M, et al. Synergistic effects of operant knowledge resources[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2010, 24(5): 400-411. DOI:10.1108/08876041011060693
64 Mikalef P, Pateli A, van de Wetering R. IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2021, 30(5): 512-540. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2020.1808541
65 Mula C, Zybura N, Hipp T. From digitalized start-up to scale-up: Opening the black box of scaling in digitalized firms towards a scaling process framework[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 202: 123275. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123275
66 Nadler D A, Tushman M L. A model for diagnosing organizational behavior[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1980, 9(2): 35-51. DOI:10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-x
67 Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2017, 41(6): 1029-1055. DOI:10.1111/etap.12254
68 Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, et al. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2017, 41(1): 223-238. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
69 Nevo S, Wade M R. The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2010, 34(1): 163-183. DOI:10.2307/20721419
70 Nevo S, Wade M R. Firm-level benefits of IT-enabled resources: A conceptual extension and an empirical assessment[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2011, 20(4): 403-418. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2011.08.001
71 Nguyen D K, Broekhuizen T, Dong J Q, et al. Leveraging synergy to drive digital transformation: A systems-theoretic perspective[J]. Information & Management, 2023, 60(7): 103836. DOI:10.1016/j.im.2023.103836
72 Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(9): 697-713. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199710)18:9<697::AID-SMJ909>3.0.CO;2-C
73 Orton J D, Weick K E. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization[J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(2): 203-223. DOI:10.2307/258154
74 Pei L J, Dong C T. Strategic synergy implementation in the evolution of platform ecosystems: A case study of Xiaomi ecosystem[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2025, 28(9): 4628-4649. DOI:10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0441
75 Peng L F, Chen Y C, Robinson S, et al. Exploring IT business value creation in a Taobao village EC ecosystem: A systems theory perspective[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2024, 206: 123534. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123534
76 Penrose E T. The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959.
77 Piccoli G, Ives B. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2005, 29(4): 747-776. DOI:10.2307/25148708
78 Pu M, Hao Y, Wang T. Effect of interactive empowerment between digital technology and social network on manufacturing firm growth: Evidence from China[J/OL]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2025.2607471, 2025-12-08.
79 Saraf N, Langdon C S, El Sawy O. IS integration and knowledge sharing in multi-unit firms: The winner’s curse[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2013, 22(6): 592-603. DOI:10.1057/ejis.2012.37
80 Schweikl S, Obermaier R. Lost in translation: IT business value research and resource complementarity-an integrative framework, shortcomings and future research directions[J]. Management Review Quarterly, 2023, 73(4): 1713-1749. DOI:10.1007/s11301-022-00284-7
81 Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Ireland R D. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(1): 273-292. DOI:10.5465/amr.2007.23466005
82 Someh I, Shanks G, Davern M. Reconceptualizing synergy to explain the value of business analytics systems[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2019, 34(4): 371-391. DOI:10.1177/0268396218816210
83 Someh I, Wixom B, Davern M, et al. Configuring relationships between analytics and business domain groups for knowledge integration[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2023, 24(2): 592-618. DOI:10.17705/1jais.00782
84 Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, et al. Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 259-276. DOI:10.1002/smj.450
85 Tang R Y, Inoue Y, Tsujimoto M. Synergy effect in platform ecosystem: A quantitative analysis of smart home products[J]. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 13482-13506. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3531993
86 Tanriverdi H. Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2006, 30(1): 57-77. DOI:10.2307/25148717
87 Teece D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319-1350. DOI:10.1002/smj.640
88 Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
89 Teo T S H, Ranganathan C. Leveraging IT resources and capabilities at the housing and development board[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2003, 12(3): 229-249. DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2003.09.002
90 Tosi H L, Slocum J W. Contingency theory: Some suggested directions[J]. Journal of Management, 1984, 10(1): 9-26. DOI:10.1177/014920638401000103
91 Venkatesh V, Bala H. Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy[J]. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23(4): 1131-1157. DOI:10.1287/isre.1110.0404
92 Wan W H, Liu L J. Intrapreneurship in the digital era: Driven by big data and human resource management?[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2021, 15(4): 843-875. DOI:10.1108/CMS-07-2020-0282
93 Wang H X, Zheng C D, Liu J Y, et al. Digital technology search and new venture performance in dynamic environments: The mediating role of competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 2022, 34(7): 1-22. DOI:10.4018/joeuc.308816
94 Wang Y, Shi S, Nevo S, et al. The interaction effect of IT assets and IT management on firm performance: A systems perspective[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2015, 35(5): 580-593. DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.006
95 Weibl J, Hess T. Turning data into value-exploring the role of synergy in leveraging value among data[J]. Information Systems Management, 2020, 37(3): 227-239. DOI:10.1080/10580530.2020.1696585
96 Weill P, Olson M H. An assessment of the contingency theory of management information systems[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1989, 6(1): 59-86. DOI:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849
97 Weritz P, Braojos J, Matute J, et al. Impact of strategic capabilities on digital transformation success and firm performance: Theory and empirical evidence[J]. European Journal of Information Systems, 2025, 34(3): 415-435. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2024.2311137
98 Wiengarten F, Humphreys P, Cao G M, et al. Exploring the important role of organizational factors in IT business value: Taking a contingency perspective on the resource-based view[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2013, 15(1): 30-46. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00332.x
99 Winter S G. Understanding dynamic capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10): 991-995. DOI:10.1002/smj.318
100 Xiao R, Wang C K. Founder resources and innovation investment: A configuration perspective[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2025, 262: 125680. DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.125680
101 Yang C, Bossink B, Peverelli P. High-tech start-up firm survival originating from a combined use of internal resources[J]. Small Business Economics, 2017, 49(4): 799-824. DOI:10.1007/s11187-017-9858-6
102 Yoo Y, Henfridsson O, Lyytinen K. Research commentary-the new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research[J]. Information Systems Research, 2010, 21(4): 724-735. DOI:10.1287/isre.1100.0322
引用本文
刘晓菊, 单标安, 陈彪. 组织资源协同研究：理论溯源、整合框架与数字化演进[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2026, 48(10): 129-152.
导出参考文献，格式为：
