6718 
7944当前，越来越多的管理研究者和实践者感受到，管理理论与管理实践之间存在巨大鸿沟。在探讨理论（“知”）与实践（“行”）关系的基础上，本文分析了理论与实践割裂的原因，并指出现存的“仅知不行”与“行仍需知”两大困境。同时，基于德鲁克之路与马奇之路的管理研究路径分析，本文认为，可以融合德鲁克与马奇两人不同的独特之路，走出一条弥合管理理论与管理实践之巨大鸿沟的第三条道路，实现管理学术研究的“知行合一”之道。此外，依托阴阳平衡原理，本文提出了通过重建范式、重建评价标准、重塑应用导向型商学院及夯实哲学基础可以提高学术研究的“知行合一”，并基于实践与理论的非对称性动态耦合分析，提倡管理学需开展“共同参与性研究”。
管理学术研究的“知行合一”之道：融合德鲁克与马奇的独特之路
摘要
参考文献
1 陈春花. 管理研究与管理实践之弥合[J]. 管理学报,2017, (10): 1421-1425 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2017.10.001
2 陈春花, 马胜辉. 中国本土管理研究路径探索——基于实践理论的视角[J]. 管理世界,2017, (11): 158-169 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-5502.2017.11.012
4 李平. 中国管理本土研究: 理念定义及范式设计[J]. 管理学报,2010, 7(5): 633-642 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2010.05.001
5 李平. 中国本土管理研究与中国传统哲学[J]. 管理学报,2013, 10(9): 1249-1261 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2013.09.001
9 罗纪宁. 中国管理学研究的实践导向与理论框架——一个组织管理系统全息结构[J]. 管理学报,2010, 7(11): 1646-1651, 1670 DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884X.2010.11.010
11 汪潇, 李平, 毕智慧. 商学院的未来之路: 知行合一[J]. 外国经济与管理,即出
13 涩泽荣一. 论语与算盘[M]. 北京: 中国青年出版社, 1916/2012.
15 Aguinis H, Vandenberg R J. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure: Improving research quality before data collection[J]. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2014, 1(1): 569-595 DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091231
17 Augier M, March J G. The pursuit of relevance in management education[J]. California Management Review,2007, 49(3): 129-146 DOI:10.2307/41166398
18 Baldvinsdottir G, Mitchell F, Nørreklit H. Issues in the relationship between theory and practice in management accounting[J]. Management Accounting Research,2010, 21(2): 79-82 DOI:10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.006
19 Banks G C, Pollack J M, Bochantin J E, et al. Management’s science–practice gap: A grand challenge for all stakeholders[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2016, 59(6): 2205-2231 DOI:10.5465/amj.2015.0728
20 Bansal P, Bertels S, Ewart T, et al. Bridging the research–practice gap[J]. Academy of Management Perspectives,2012, 26(1): 73-92 DOI:10.5465/amp.2011.0140
23 Bergh D D, Perry J, Hanke R. Some predictors of SMJ article impact[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2006, 27(1): 81-100 DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
24 Bourdieu P. The logic of practice[M]. Stanford, Clif.: Stanford University Press, 1990.
26 Cascio W F, Aguinis H. Research in industrial and organizational psychology from 1963 to 2007: Changes, choices, and trends[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2008, 93(5): 1062-1081 DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1062
27 Colquitt J A. The next three years at AMJ—Maintaining the mission while expanding the Journal[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2011, 54(1): 9-14 DOI:10.5465/amj.2011.59215082
28 Donham W B. Essential groundwork for a broad executive theory[J]. Harvard Business Review,1922, 1(1): 1-10
29 Drucker P F. The future of industrial man[M]. New York: Routledge, 1942/1995.
30 Duncan W J. Management theory and the practice of management[J]. Business Horizons,1974, 17(5): 48-52 DOI:10.1016/0007-6813(74)90037-8
31 Foucault M. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison[M]. New York: Vintage Books, 1977.
33 Gibbons M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies[M]. London: Sage Pub., 1994.
34 Giddens A. The Constitution of Society[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.
35 Gordon R A, Howell J E. （1959）. Higher education for business[M]. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
36 Gr ey, C. Re-imagining relevance: A response to Starkey and Madan[J]. British Journal of Management,2001, 12: S27-S32 DOI:10.1111/bjom.2001.12.issue-s1
38 Heidegger M. Being and Time[M]. New York: Harper Perennial, 1962.
39 Judge T A, Cable D M, Colbert A E, et al. What causes a management article to be cited—Article, Author, or Journal?[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(3): 491-506 DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.25525577
40 Kieser A, Leiner L. Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2009, 46(3): 516-533 DOI:10.1111/joms.2009.46.issue-3
41 Kieser A, Nicolai A, Seidl D. The practical relevance of management research: Turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2015, 9(1): 143-233 DOI:10.5465/19416520.2015.1011853
42 Lewis M W. Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide[J]. Academy of Management Review,2000, 25(4): 760-776 DOI:10.5465/amr.2000.3707712
43 Li P P. Towards a geocentric framework of organizational form: A holistic, dynamic and paradoxical approach[J]. Organization Studies,1998, 19(5): 829-861 DOI:10.1177/017084069801900506
44 Li P P. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2012, 29(4): 849-872 DOI:10.1007/s10490-011-9250-z
46 Li P P. The epistemology of Yin-Yang Balancing as the root of Chinese traditional culture[A]. Spencer-Rodgers J & Peng K-P （Eds.）, The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism[C], Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 （Chapter 2; in press）.
47 Lockett A, McWilliams A. The balance of trade between disciplines: do we effectively manage knowledge?[J]. Journal of Management Inquiry,2005, 14(2): 139-150 DOI:10.1177/1056492605276645
48 Lüscher L S, Lewis M W. Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2008, 51(2): 221-240 DOI:10.5465/amj.2008.31767217
50 Nicolini D. Practice theory, work and organization: An introduction[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
51 Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Podsakoff N P, et al. Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century[J]. Journal of Management,2008, 34(4): 641-720 DOI:10.1177/0149206308319533
52 Pullins E B, Timonen H, Kaski T, et al. An investigation of the theory practice gap in professional sales[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice,2017, 25(1): 17-38 DOI:10.1080/10696679.2016.1236665
54 Schatzki T R, Knorr-Cetina K, Savigny E V. The Practice Turn In Contemporary Theory[M], Routledge: London, 2001.
55 Simon H A. The business school a problem in organizational design[J]. Journal of Management Studies,1967, 4(1): 1-16 DOI:10.1111/joms.1967.4.issue-1
56 Shapiro D L, Kirkman B L, Courtney H G. Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(2): 249-266 DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.24634433
57 Splitter V, Seidl D. Does practice-based research on strategy lead to practically relevant knowledge? Implications of a Bourdieusian perspective[J]. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,2011, 47(1): 98-120 DOI:10.1177/0021886310396322
58 Swan J, Bresnen M, Robertson M, et al. When policy meets practice: Colliding logics and the challenges of ‘mode 2’initiatives in the translation of academic knowledge[J]. Organization Studies,2010, 31(9-10): 1311-1340 DOI:10.1177/0170840610374402
59 Tranfield D, Starkey K. The nature, social organization and promotion of management research: Towards policy[J]. British Journal of Management,1998, 9(4): 341-353 DOI:10.1111/bjom.1998.9.issue-4
60 Tsui A S. The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship[J]. Management and Organization Review,2013, 9(3): 375-394 DOI:10.1111/more.12035
61 Tushman M, O’Reilly Ⅲ C. Research and relevance: Implications of Pasteur’s quadrant for doctoral programs and faculty development[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007, 50(4): 769-774 DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.26279169
62 Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously[J]. The Academy of Management Annals,2012, 6(1): 285-336 DOI:10.5465/19416520.2012.672039
63 Van de Ven A H. Nothing is quite so practical as a good theory[J]. Academy of management Review,1989, 14(4): 486-489 DOI:10.5465/amr.1989.4308370
64 Van de Ven A H. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
65 Van de Ven A H, Jing R T. Indigenous management research in China from an engaged scholarship perspective[J]. Management and Organization Review,2012, 8(1): 123-137 DOI:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00281.x
66 Van de Ven A H, Johnson P E. Knowledge for theory and practice[J]. Academy of management review,2006, 31(4): 802-821 DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.22527385
67 Whitley, R. The scientific status of management research as a practically-oriented social science[J]. Journal of Management Studies,1984, 21(4): 369-390 DOI:10.1111/joms.1984.21.issue-4
68 Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations[M]. Oxford: Blackwell, 1958.
引用本文
李平, 杨政银, 陈春花. 管理学术研究的“知行合一”之道：融合德鲁克与马奇的独特之路[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2018, 40(12): 28-45.
导出参考文献，格式为：
